User talk:EGarrett01

You're cool, bro!

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 00:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss the article, not the editors

When in a content dispute on an article talk page please stick to discussing the content and avoid commenting on the editors. It is inappropriate to suggest that editors who disagree with you should be "investigated".

As I have just informed you above this area is under special sanctions and editors working in this area are expected to closely adhere to Wikipedia policies. This includes our civility and no personal attacks policy. Failure to do so can result in sanctions that range from blocking to topic bans.

Thank you. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 00:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you holding people who are deliberately removing relevant and highly newsworthy content from those pages to the same standards? The investigation I'm talking about is looking into what edits those people have made and whether their accounts are suitable for wikipedia. Including topic-banning them specifically. Not that those bans mean anything because people can just switch IP's in seconds. Make that effort and show everyone that you're primarily a reference source and not a mouthpiece for a partisan and invalidated point of view. EGarrett01 (talk) 11:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]