User talk:ECarlisle

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

ECarlisle, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ECarlisle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi ECarlisle, thank you for your comments at my RfA. I hope that I'll be able to answer your concerns with my actions rather than my words. Cheers, ansh 666 23:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITEVAR

Please review this guideline. If an article has adopted a style (say, a manual style instead of the lazy, inflexible, code-filled templates), then do not change it unless there is a clear consensus on the Talk page to do so. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LQ

Please note that, unlike most style guides, the Wikipedia Manual of Style generally requires that quotation marks go outside the end quote, unless the quoted material contains an independent clause that ends with the punctuation mark included. see WP:LQ. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:03, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SPI notice

A sock puppet investigation that involves this account has been filed here: [[1]]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of HughD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · rfcu · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]