User talk:E6nvikas

The article Educare india has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 10:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Educare india

A tag has been placed on Educare india, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KuroiShiroi (contribs) 18:10, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Arguement - To Discuss

I am just practicing to write the articles. And yes, I believe the subjects of my articles and references are valid and need to be here on wiki, as they are of great concepts of puiblic reference needs than many others that have been categorised and hosted. But if some of you think otherwise , it's a free choice that all of us has in our position of position, authority and influence.

I hoipe I will learn to write, edit and style the pages better in the coming future with practice and may be some advisory inputs from others. - VIKAS

Thanks for commenting and suggesting a way forward ! I have done some learning to edit and style the article differently. Is it shaping up well to remove the DELETION tag !!! I would continue to contribute towards WIKI India project now and then to enrich this reliable online public information and knowledge resource platform.E6nvikas (talk) 12:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ruraldevse

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ruraldevse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced article about a developmental program by an organization that itself may be insufficiently notable (for wikipedia article). Needs independent, secondary sources to establish notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Abecedare (talk) 03:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, E6nvikas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Abecedare (talk) 08:15, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI and sock account

Hi, In case you are associated with Educare India, you should read wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest before creating more articles related to the organization. Also, can you please confirm if you are also User:Ib40 ? Abecedare (talk) 08:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Educare india logo.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Educare india logo.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Abecedare (talk) 08:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic summaries

In certain circumstances, an automatic summary is generated when an edit is saved without one. This is slightly different to the summary added when editing a section, as that can be modified by the user before saving.

Situation	Page	Text
Creating or replacing a page with a redirect ('$1' is replaced with the target of the redirect)	MediaWiki:Autoredircomment	[[WP:AES\|←]]Redirected page to [[$1]]
Removing all text from a page	MediaWiki:Autosumm-blank	[[WP:AES\|←]]Blanked the page
Removing most of the text from a page, or editing a short page ('$1' is replaced with the page text)	MediaWiki:Autosumm-replace	[[WP:AES\|←]]Replaced content with '$1'
Creating a new page ($1 is replaced with the page text)	MediaWiki:Autosumm-new	[[WP:AES\|←]]Created page with '$1'

With the exception of the automatic summary when creating a redirect, which usually says all that needs to be said, these are not a substitute for a proper edit summary – you should always leave a meaningful summary, even in the above cases. They are, however, useful in providing some context for edits made by inexperienced users who are not aware of the importance of edit summaries, and for spotting vandalism. E6nvikas (talk) 20:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You put a new editor off for a month to read the policies first !

Ok, Hope i do well after June 2009, if i'll wish to !! Thanx wikipedians !!! E6nvikas (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Educare India

I have nominated Educare India, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educare India. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Educare India

I have nominated Educare India, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educare India (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Educare India

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Educare India. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educare India (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:EduCARE India

Template:EduCARE India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 06:35, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]