User talk:E2J3

This is E2J3's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Sugar Bakery (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still a local business that got a mention on The Today Show. WP:MILL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southern Sugar Bakery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Southern Sugar Bakery, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, E2J3! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Southern Sugar Bakery has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Southern Sugar Bakery. Thanks! Chetsford (talk) 02:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Sugar Bakery has been accepted

Southern Sugar Bakery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harshdeep Kaur

You've put a lot of sources recently out of which some are unreliable as per WP:ICTF and WP:RS which I've removed and re added tags. Kindly add only reliable sources. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:58, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know! I'll definitely refer to WP:ICTF for a list of reliable sources on the subject. Thanks again. E2J3 (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Donald S. Long) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Donald S. Long.

User:Rosguill while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

It's not clear to me that the cited sources are sufficiently reliable to contribute toward the subject's notability. If possible, please provide additional citations to more clearly reliable sources, preferably sources with a wider-than-local readership.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi {{Re|Rosguill}} - Thank you for reaching out to me directly. I added an additional book citation that I'd found, but didn't include before. It's a book that's available on amazon and you can buy paperback elsewhere. I really feel like Dandy Don had more than a local appeal. I don't live in Louisiana, but knew about him from following college football. Please let me know if this changes your mind about his notability.E2J3 (talk) 10:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Course5 Intelligence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Course5 Intelligence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Course5 Intelligence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]