User talk:E. S. V. Leigh

Fair use rationale for File:TumPstooldisplayWP13.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumPstooldisplayWP13.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:13, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMstandAdetailWP7.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMstandAdetailWP7.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMcoffinWP1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMcoffinWP1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMchamberWP2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMchamberWP2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMservingstandsWP6.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMservingstandsWP6.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumWscreenWP16.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumWscreenWP16.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMceremonyWP10.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMceremonyWP10.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMinlaidtableWP3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMinlaidtableWP3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMplaintableWP5.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMplaintableWP5.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMstandAbackdwgWP9.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMstandAbackdwgWP9.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMstandAdwgWP8.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMstandAdwgWP8.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumPstanddwgWP11.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumPstanddwgWP11.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumPstooldwgWP12.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumPstooldwgWP12.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumWscreendwgWP17.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumWscreendwgWP17.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumMMtablemountWP4.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumMMtablemountWP4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TumPlionWP14.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TumPlionWP14.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:32, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, E. S. V. Leigh. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page.
Message added 19:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GordionwoodstorageWP18.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GordionwoodstorageWP18.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:TumMMWPintro.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TumMMWPintro.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In re these notices - the images can be tagged immediately (although most do give a couple hours' leeway) if they are not used in the article space - so it's best to do the image upload last, when the article is ready to be put into the article space (out of the sandbox/user space). That way you won't get users & bots tagging all of the images. Skier Dude (talk 03:26, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, E. S. V. Leigh. You have new messages at Koppas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:TumMMtablemountWP4.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TumMMtablemountWP4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GordionwoodstorageWP18.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GordionwoodstorageWP18.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TumPlionbullWP15.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TumPlionbullWP15.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas Card

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png

Merry Christmas

At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green and Yellow Present.gif

File:Yellow and Red present.gif

File:Blue and Red Present.gif

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Theatre of Dionysus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lycurgus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry if this message has been confusing. I've been working on it, but it still isn't exactly to my liking.

But anyways! For one thing, there is absolutely nothing you're required to do. DPL bot is only a service to editors; everything is voluntary. Regarding the message, well, when you edited Theatre of Dionysus, you added a link to Lycurgus, but that's just a "Did you mean..." disambiguation page. DPL bot is asking you to edit the article so we know which article you actually intended the Lycurgus link to go to. --JaGa^talk 16:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brygos Painter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kylix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Spoils of War (symposium) has been accepted

The Spoils of War (symposium), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, E. S. V. Leigh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, E. S. V. Leigh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, E. S. V. Leigh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to The Spoils of War (symposium), you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mys_721tx (talk) 16:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Mys_721tx (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The number of years the current version has been in existence is not a valid justification for the unencyclopedic tone used in the article. The manual of style stated that any article suffering from puffery language such as "award-winning" and "ground-breaking" should be rewritten to correct the problem or may be tagged with an appropriate template. If you are unwilling to rectify the problem, leave the maintenance template so that other editors can do so. -Mys_721tx (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Ground-breaking" is an opinion and not a fact. It is unencyclopedic to represent an opinion as fact. To state such in an article, you must provide attribution by whom the symposium is considered ground-breaking. Please refer to the natural point of view policy and its FAQ for further information.
Regarding the in-line citations, I have marked some problematic areas. In general, statements should be supported by references and opinions should be attributed to its owner. The citation and the statement it supports should also be kept closely together. Please refer to the manual of style for more information.

-Mys_721tx (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your update. However, there are still some problems in the article:

Please avoid using vague attribution and attribute opinions to person in text. For example, who considered the symposium ground-breaking?
State the fact instead of appeal to emotion. Avoid using sentence such as "[t]he combined testimony laid bare another horrifying dimension to the anguish of human suffering wrought by the Second World War." If you have sources to show the damages done to artifacts during World War II in a factual manner, use that instead.
Unless there is a source directly listed the international press coverage, using the news reports by various paper to arrive the conclusion that the symposium received extensive coverage is synthesis. Per No original research policy, such analysis must be avoided.
Remember to sign your comment in any discussion pages.

-Mys_721tx (talk) 23:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mys 721tx. In answer to your latest comments,

The way I have worded my text now is appropriate, with two citations listed attesting to the importance of the symposium. I realize you dislike the term "ground-breaking," but the references cited here, and throughout the article, should be sufficient to indicate that it was just that. I am not sure why this seems offensive to you, so I hope you can let it go.
I am not "appealing to emotion" in order to argue a point; I am merely stating a fact. Anyone would agree that "[t]he combined testimony laid bare another horrifying dimension to the anguish of human suffering wrought by the Second World War." The looting of art and cultural property during and after the war was indeed horrendous. The article and all the references cited makes this clear.
Your contention that "using the news reports by various paper[s] to arrive [at] the conclusion that the symposium received extensive coverage is synthesis. Per No original research policy, such analysis must be avoided" - this is not the way endnotes/citations work in scholarly articles. Being Chinese, perhaps you do not understand the conventions of western citations. All the articles I cited are about the symposium or refer to it; thus these are de facto evidence that the symposium received extensive coverage.
Yes, I will remember to sign.

I was happy to add the extra citations, which I think are useful although not entirely necessary in this short article. Beyond this, however, you seem intent on diminishing this symposium and damaging the article. Your latest comment smacks of bullying/harassment, which was possibly not your intent. I am all for improving the article, which I hope I have done. You seem to be interested in the subject. You can click on the link at the bottom and access the entire text. The story is sad but compelling. Enjoy. E. S. V. Leigh (talk) 00:08, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis of original materials is accepted and even encouraged in scholarly work. However, Wikipedia is not a place for such analysis and every fact and opinion should be directly supported by reliable, published sources. Per the Wikipedia:No original research policy, editors may not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. In the case of the media coverage, unless the sources cited themselves explicitly state that the symposium had received extensive international coverage, they cannot be used prove the coverage.
Please keep in mind that Wikipedia:neutral point of view is a core content policy and is "non-negotiable". "Ground-breaking" and similar remarks are opinions and should be attributed in the text to the person or group who holds the opinion. Without in-text attribution, those remarks are being presented as facts.
Wikipedia:Verifiability policy requires all content to be verifiable to published sources. "The burden to demonstrate verifiability ... is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." In the case of the damage in World War II, these statements must be individually cited. The Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy further requires that "[a] neutral point of view neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject". The statement does not represent a neutral point of view and also lacks direct support from source.
The problems I raised are not because they are offensive to me but because the article as it stands does not satisfy serval Wikipedia policies. I, too, wish to improve this article. It is regrettable that my previous comment has come across as damaging the article.

-Mys_721tx (talk) 02:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mys 721tx. I removed "ground-breaking." Hope it makes your day:)E. S. V. Leigh (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]