User talk:E.ThomasWood

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello E.ThomasWood, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary
Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
Create a User page
Be bold
Ignore all rules

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax ^τεχ 10:03, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

re: watchlist

The "/crap" subpage in my userspace is an area I created for the collection of bad edits to various prominent articles. A certain vandal originally known as "DickyRobert" had been using hundreds of sockpuppet accounts to post an administrator's alleged home telephone number into prominent articles, usually ones linked from the main page. I removed all the edits I can find and transferred them into a pile. Since then, the pile got moved to the "Abuse reports" page as evidence to be forwarded to the guy's ISP, in an effort to get the plug pulled.

If a page on your watchlist gets moved, both the old title and the new title remain on your watchlist. I had split apart the edit histories of various articles, one of which you must have had watchlisted, and moved the "bad" parts out of the article to reduce visibility. So, no, your account has not been hacked, and neither has mine, it's just an unintended side effect of the way watchlists react to page moves. — Jun. 25, '06 [20:43] <freak|talk>

E. Thomas Wood

My intention in adding the {{autobiography}} tag was not as an attack, but simply a means to attract other editors who would be better suited to write the article (as you yourself said that you wanted). Best, Irongargoyle 14:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Thomas, unfortunately the artice that you created for yourself did not meet Wikipedia policies, so it had to be deleted. If someone does create an article about you, you are welcome to leave guidance on the article's talk page or correct any factual inaccuracies in the article itself. Personally, I would love to see an article about you created for Wikipedia. If you could give me more guidance about where specifically to find published information about yourself, I would be happy to put together a proper stub. Kaldari 16:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of Seigenthaler, I wrote a good portion of the current article for him that's up now, but I'm not really happy with the pictures. For example, the picture of him at the typewriter is a photo of a newspaper print of a photo. You don't have any connections at the Tennessean that could supply better pictures do you? P.S. I replied to your post about the Nashville Banner and changed the text. Kaldari 19:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overlapping interests

Saw this in your bio: "WORK IN PROGRESS: Research on police responses to anarchist violence in England and France in the 1890s". One of my minor interests is in anarchist assassins. For example, I wrote the articles on Gustave Bouvet and Gennaro Rubino. Do you know about the Labadie Collection in Michigan? It may be a useful resource for you. Kaldari 20:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Riversidecentlogotrans 000.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Riversidecentlogotrans 000.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 06:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Etheridge

No problem. To change an article title, just use the "move" tab at the top of the page (next to the "history" tab). Happy editing! Cmprince 03:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Train Wreck

Nice article on the train wreck. That interview recording is great. Thanks for putting it up. Kaldari 05:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ryan. By the way, I didn't see your note about anarchist interests for some months as I was slammed with work. But one of these days I'll get around to pitching in material from my dissertation on the "war on terror" against anarchism in the late 19th and early 20th century. A badly formatted version of it is available at http://www.the-wood-family.org/Tom/Teaching/DissertationPart1.htm.

Tom Wood 13:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giarratana

Hi. Would you mind taking another look at Anthony D. "Tony" Giarratana?

One of the flags you added suggests that there is a notability issue and that the article ought to "reference published, third-party sources about the subject." I wonder whether that tag may have been added in haste, without taking into account the buildings that the guy has already put up -- leaving aside the one he wants to put up, Signature Tower, which has its own Wikipedia page and has been the subject of media coverage outside of Nashville.

Both that tag and another, stating that "this article does not cite any references or sources," do not appear to take into account the roughly 40 news articles on Giarratana available via the NashvillePost.com link given at the bottom of the article.

For the record, I have no connection to the subject of this article; I have never even met him. I'm adding a number of entries these days on topics that I consider significant to the current state of money and power in my hometown, Nashville. Our metro area is one of the 30 largest in the country, and so I tend to think that people making big news here are noteworthy enough to merit coverage in Wikipedia.

In this instance, the subject is well-known primarily for what he has done in this market, but those deeds have gained significant attention nationally. I would tend to believe, however, that a person or entity sufficiently important on a purely local basis in a city of our size may merit an entry. I'm not aware, though, of any Wikipedia guidance that would guide notability decisions based on local importance. Maybe there should be some.

I'd like to hear your thoughts before I do anything else with the Tony G. article. Thanks. Tom Wood 03:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giarratana certainly seems notable enough. For biographies in Wikipedia the criterion is that the person must have been written about in third-party, peer-reviewed publications, such as newspapers, magazines, or books. The publicity should be obvious via citations of the facts in the article using the publications. An "External Links" section ought to be used for things like linking to the subject's web site, or perhaps to photographs that are not GFDL, not for verifying the facts of the article. Readers are skeptical of everything in Wikipedia, due to the ease of adding material, therefore everything should be cited by a reputable source, so the reader can quickly verify any part of it. I'll remove the notability tag, but you'll need to go through some of the newspaper articles and create citations for your article. (Use WP:CITE as a guide.) I don't have any issue with local-only notability; I just go through new articles each day looking mostly for vanity pages and unreferenced articles, and Giarratana's article probably piqued my tag-happiness by not having a "References" section. You might be surprised what a high percentage of new articles are pretty worthless.--Appraiser 13:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might be surprised what a high percentage of new articles are pretty worthless. I can readily imagine, and have seen a few examples. Thanks for getting back to me. I'll fold in citations as you suggest. I tend to screw up technically when I try to insert those, so I guess I have gotten into the habit of putting external links out there as a lazy man's way to contribute, but I'm going to try to master the arcane business of ref tags. Tom Wood 14:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, Giarratana is just now opening a 45-story mixed-use tower at 5th and Church in Nashville, after many years of efforts to build there. It's the tallest residential structure in Tennessee and looks directly down on the Life & Casualty Building, which was the tallest tower in the Southeast when completed in 1957. I have a very good rendering by Giarratana, from Metro Nashville Archives, of the 57-story Columbia-HCA Healthcare Tower he pitched for that site in the mid-1990s. The place remained a surface parking lot for 20+ years until the current structure went up.Tom Wood (talk) 05:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania in Atlanta!

Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!

P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 07:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Drowota

Fixed it. --Smashville^BONK! 19:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism: Nashville connection to Haymarket affair

Ryan, I have just found an item in an 1886 Nashville newspaper indicating that Adolph Fischer, an anarchist ultimately hanged for a supposed role in the Haymarket bombing that year, had spent time in Nashville and was the brother of a local printer.

Just asking because I know you have interests in both Nashville history and 19th-century anarchist movements: Do you know whether anyone has covered this connection in past historiography. I'm thinking of featuring it in my weekly history column at NashvillePost.com.

All best, Tom

Tom Wood (talk) 04:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's interesting. I'm pretty sure no one in Nashville at least has uncovered this connection before. The only other connection between 19th-century anarchism and Nashville that I know of is Ross Winn (and that was only uncovered recently). I would love to help investigate if you have any leads. Kaldari (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I wanted to pass along a tidbit I dug up recently: Apparently there was a newspaper published in Nashville around the turn of the century called The Labor Advocate that no one seems to know about. It was published at least from 1902-1905 although I haven't been able to dig up any good info about it yet. Kaldari (talk) 00:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an article about Fischer's Nashville connection from The New York Times. Kaldari (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much for the NYT piece, Ryan. I love the way they are putting more and more historical material out for free. I'm scanning in material from the 1886 Banner volume and will add to the Fischer entry.

I certainly haven't encountered The Labor Advocate and am fairly sure it's not among the microfilm holdings in the library's Nashville Room. I'll see Metro's archivist later this week and will try to remember to quiz him about that title. Tom Wood (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Stokes

Yeah, that'd probably be better; I misread the article (sorry!). If you want to move it to that, go ahead...I just didn't really think "fraud artist" was the most neutral dab method we could use. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scott, I don't actually know how to change the title of a page. I have had to ask for help on that before. Do you mind making the change? Thanks.

Tom Wood (talk) 23:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-meetup Nashville on Labor Day weekend!

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello E.ThomasWood! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Alexander S. Heard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Eric Etheridge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anthony D. Giarratana

The article Anthony D. Giarratana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 06:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, E.ThomasWood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, E.ThomasWood. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, E.ThomasWood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Geneva--ETW.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Geneva--ETW.jpg, which you've attributed to Fred Clarke. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]