User talk:E-man615

Welcome!

Hello, E-man615, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Carlon Jeffery, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carlon Jeffery

The article Carlon Jeffery has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

place reason here

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Luck Charlie (film)

Hey I redirected your article Good Luck Charlie (film) to the main Good Luck Charlie article. This was previously done with Good Luck Charlie: The Movie. As best as I could tell the upcoming TV movie does not meet the notability guidelines for films. I also found and cited a plot summary from IMDB and added it to the Good Luck Charlie article. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 22:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mia Talerico (actress)

The article Mia Talerico (actress) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

place reason here

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ۞ Tbhotch ^™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 23:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. ۞ Tbhotch ^™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 23:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carlon Jeffery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carlon Jeffery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, E-man615, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nsaa (talk) 16:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Good Luck Charlie (season 2) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bluefist ^talk 21:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Good Luck Charlie (season 2) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Good Luck Charlie (season 2) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Good Luck Charlie (season 2). RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to iCarly (season 5), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Gruselfratze (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 3). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. AussieLegend (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mia Talerico (actress)

The article Mia Talerico (actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too short, no sources provided

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that a previous Mia Talerico article was nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was "redirect to Good Luck Charlie" because the actress is non-notable. Accordingly, I've redirected Mia Talerico (actress) since it is a plausible redirect but as the actress remains non-notable the article should not be recreated. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carlon Jeffery

The article Carlon Jeffery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Fails WP:ENT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 00:29, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of So Random! episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of So Random! episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Many of your edits have been reverted because they are unsourced, contain original research or, as in the case of this edit introduced content that was not supported by the citation supplied. Please be more carefuyl when editing. AussieLegend (talk) 03:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mato (talk) 23:09, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 Hours for Disruptive Editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carlon Jeffery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carlon Jeffery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlon Jeffery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 04:01, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userpages

You'll notice that your userpage has disappeared. This is for your own good, and for Wikipedia's own protection. I apologize for the inconvenience; please consult this page for more information. DS (talk) 15:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Start It Up (Shake It Up) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Socialservice (talk) 21:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shake It Up New Years Special‎‎

The article Shake It Up New Years Special‎‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nate • (chatter) 22:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of Fish Hooks episodes, you may be blocked from editing. You have previously been blocked for adding original research to articles. If you persist, you will find the next block is longer, possibly permanently AussieLegend (talk) 10:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to ICarly (season 4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 20:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Shake It Up episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 23:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carlon Jeffery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carlon Jeffery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlon Jeffery (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]