User talk:Dziadzia
Hi, Dziadzia. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Mootros (talk) 19:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Richard Brathwaite Lloyd Fitzwilliams
[edit]Please do not remove tags unless you have remedied the issues. if you disagree with the tags please discuss on the article talk page to reach concensus. Also please read the manual of style you will see that Big Text is not used in normal paragraphs. NtheP (talk) 21:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Richardfitzwilliamsphoto.JPG
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Richardfitzwilliamsphoto.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 10:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Richardfitzwilliamsphoto.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Richardfitzwilliamsphoto.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Richardfitzwilliamsphoto.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Richardfitzwilliamsphoto.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
September 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
- Why do you refuse to go to the link given in the image deletion notice and on this page too which takes you to the copyright tags? There you can select the proper licence under which this image is licenced but you state that the image File:Richard Fitzwilliams photo 2.JPG is a This simple, harmless photograph is THE COPYRIGHT OF FITZWILLIAMS AND ASSOCIATES.. In that case they own the copyright and we must have their express permission to use it unless you can prove it to be freely licenced which does not seem to be the case. Please have the copyright owner follow the procedure found at WP:PERMISSION. If you do not add a proper proven copyright tag to the image page it will be deleted because we take copyright status very seriously. Many images uploaded are copyright violations because the images are still in copyright and are simply stolen from their owners. Sorry you find it so difficult but there are rules we have to follow and copyright is one we are especially critical with. ww2censor (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:RichardFitzwilliams.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:RichardFitzwilliams.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Richard Fitzwilliams
[edit]Hello. Please participate in the discussions in the talk page about the article "Richard Fitzwilliams". -- Hoary (talk) 22:12, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hello? Anyone there? Convert the malformed notes into properly formed notes, not vice versa. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 13:28, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Your knowledge of Richard Fitzwilliams
[edit]In this edit, you alter
- He obtained a first-class BA Honours degree in 1971
to
- He obtained a first-class BA Honours degree on 11th December 1971
The detail of your knowledge of Fitzwilliams continues to impress me. Where does the knowledge come from? -- Hoary (talk) 23:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- (I almost hate to mention it, but I have sometimes documented data like this by finding dates of graduate ceremonies. But anyway, it's unencyclopedic detail except for the most famous people.) DGG ( talk ) 15:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
style
[edit]I am making changes in style to conform to the usual Wikipedia practice, and I will thank you not to reverse them.I have a great deal of experience in making articles such as this acceptable, and I remind you that the further people with COI stay away from it, the better.
- We refer to everyone after the first mention by the last name only--with the exception of performers better known by their first name only. Using both names is seen as promotional, as a attempt to show off the full name as a point of personal pride (similarly with companies, we use the brief name in text, not the legal name) The only place in your article where it was necessary was in discussing the family, but most of that was unencyclopedic and removed. In fact, we normally prefer "he" to giving the name, when unambiguous; usually I include the name only once per section to start off the section.
- When there's a linked person mentioned, the nature of their career is usually left to the article on them. More is usually considered promotional, in seeking to address the subject's name with other more notable people.
The net result of other than the plainest writing for people of relatively borderline notability is to provoke the deletion of the article: it influence the way people here look at it. DGG ( talk ) 15:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Fitzwilliams, you may be blocked from editing. DGG ( talk ) 16:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)