User talk:Dylanpatel

Edit Wars

Love the attitude put forth on your page, haha. I'm glad I got into this mix as soon as I did because some of these vandals can prove to be quite a handful. Moksha88 02:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Mandir

If you come across the word 'sect,' go ahead an change it as the word itself has a heretical connotation. Just a FYI. Moksha88 22:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Group is good. Denomination is so-so but still better than sect. This is just the opinion of a fellow NDC member who I talk to on a regular basis. By the way, thanks for your help on the Swaminarayan article. We finally reached a compromise! Moksha88 04:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Jay swaminarayan; Kesava Deo Temple; Shegaon; Economy of Illinois; Maninagar; Memoni language; Vadtal; Ogle County, Illinois; Shri Purohit Swami; Gajanan Maharaj; Bhuj; Aditya Hridayam; Laxminarayan Temple; Lucknow; Sundara Kanda; Memon; DuPage County, Illinois; Religion in India; Hindu temple architecture

Cleanup: Someshwara; Oswego, Illinois; Rameswaram
Merge: Sindhi Memon; Rupee; Maricha
Add Sources: Patel; Government of Illinois; Shri Pawahari Balkrishn Yatiji
Wikify: Anil Kumble; Paramara; Mahadev Desai
Expand: Vaishnavism; DeKalb, Illinois; Mathura

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:AkshardhamDelhi2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AkshardhamDelhi2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Swaminarayan!

Image:AkshardhamDelhi2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AkshardhamDelhi2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bleh999 08:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nairobimandir.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Nairobimandir.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bleh999 08:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chicagomandir.jpg

I have tagged Image:Chicagomandir.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bleh999 08:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bapscare.JPG

I have tagged Image:Bapscare.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bleh999 08:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Houstonmandir.jpg

I have tagged Image:Houstonmandir.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bleh999 08:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bapslogo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bapslogo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I have noticed your work on Swaminarayan related pages and wanted to invited you to join WP:Swaminarayan. If you have any questions please contact me through my talkpage Juthani1 ^tcs 23:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bapstemples.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bapstemples.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 23:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Pramukhswami.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Pramukhswami.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 08:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:DDM-Arrivalsmall.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:DDM-Arrivalsmall.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Janmangal Namavali

The article Janmangal Namavali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and seems to be purely copy pasted content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 14:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]