User talk:Dyamantese

No fair use images on user pages

That better? I would assume the edit summary should be enough. The policy states that there should be no fair use images on user page, so I removed it. If you think it's bad or something, bring it up on the policy talk page. Nemu 19:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope.

haha. did you get that from the 'i hate America' on my page? nope. im not a Canadian. i am in fact an American. I just dislike GREATLY, my country. +SPQR

Marilyn Monroe pornographic film

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Marilyn Monroe pornographic film, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Resurgent insurgent 07:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dyamantese, I've nominated Marilyn Monroe pornographic film for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Monroe pornographic film. I am sorry to do this after you've put work into the article, but I just don't believe that the article is true. I spent a fair amount of time looking for sources to verify the claims in the article, but I can barely find anything that references the rumor, let alone anything at all that confirms the rumor as true. I think this is basically one of those internet legends that just floats around and never dies. And without any reliable sources, I fear that it violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. --JayHenry 20:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anchorage-in-Vineland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anchorage-in-Vineland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anchorage-in-Vineland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 19:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]