User talk:Dwspig2

Hello, Dwspig2, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Provide an Edit summary
Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask.--CTSWyneken^(talk) 23:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mustangs.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mustangs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gov rendell.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gov rendell.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gov rendell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gov rendell.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No license on image:Michaelangelo David.jpg

Image copyright problem with Image:Michaelangelo David.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Michaelangelo David.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Please note that the PD-art license is not applicable, since the photo was taken within the last 100 years. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 21:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lexophilia

Hi! I'm considering nominating the article Lexophilia for deletion (see Talk:Lexophilia and article itself for the reasons), but before that, I'm going to make some googling to see if this word is not actually a term used somewhere. If you happen to know such a usage, it would be very helpful if you drop a note, so that my survey is made easier. Otherwise, be bold, be happy, and keep on editing! ... said: Rursus (^mbork³) 10:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lexophilia

I have nominated Lexophilia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexophilia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. [Belinrahs|^talktome⁄ _ididit] 18:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]