User talk:Dvanduyse

Welcome!

Hello, Dvanduyse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --B (talk) 02:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calvary Chapel

Please use the "Show preview" button to test your changes, rather than submitting 30 edits in a row. It really makes it rather difficult to see what was changed. Also, please see Wikipedia's policies on reliable sources, verifiability, and biographies of living persons. Controversial content about living persons, such as [1] must be well-sourced. Just linking to Smith's website does not demonstrate (1) that he made the statements in question or (2) that it has been criticized. Reliable sources should be news media outlets. Is there a news story about Smith or Calvary Chapel being criticized for those comments? (Not just some guy's rant on his blog, but an actual news story from a reliable source demonstrating that the criticism is notable) If so, please feel free to readd it as properly sourced content. --B (talk) 02:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Books about Smith/Solomon's Temple

Do you personally have these books in your possession and do they mention Chuck Smith by name? Do these books actually say that he plans to blow up the building or do they merely refer to the religious belief that at some point in the future, Israel is going to rebuild the temple and that at some point in the future, someone (be it Israel, God personally, a terrorist, whatever) is going to move the Dome of the Rock out of the way to make that happen? There's a big difference between believing that something will happen (most conservative Christians believe that the temple will be rebuilt at some point) and plotting to make it happen. If you would like to email me the text from the book that you are using to source these statements for my review, you can do so using special:emailuser/B. --B (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calvary Chapel criticisms

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Calvary Chapel. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Joe Sewell (talk) 20:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calvary Chapel

The IP user removing those criticism may be a member of the church; I especially think their edit summary here tends to be evidence of that. It looks like most of it remains in the article; if there is more removal of content, I'd say to tag the article with {{coi}}. If they continue, you can file a Request for Comment to try to get other users to give outside opinions. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 21:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Calvary Chapel.

For the Mediation Committee, WJBscribe (talk) 22:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Willing

Hi Dvanduyse. Are you still looking for someone to help with mediation on the Calvary Chapel page? I am willing to help. I noticed the COI tag this evening and have looked into the history and talk page a little bit. To give you some disclosure, I grew up in a Calvary Chapel (was there about 20 years) but now fellowship in a different denomination. I have some sympathy both with supporters and detractors of CC, and I feel I could provide an informed but impartial voice to help find a compromise. One caveat: I am quite busy in real life, so please do not expect me to be available more often than once every day or two, and please do not expect me to read pages upon pages of material.

If you and User:Joe Sewell both agree that my participation would be helpful, then we can take this to Talk:Calvary Chapel. Why don't we start with a brief statement of the issues that you would like a mediator to address. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 04:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calvary Chapel

Hi. I am notifying everyone who participated in discussions on Talk:Calvary Chapel last July or so that I have posted some proposed principles on the issues that were under discussion then. Your input is welcome. Thanks, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 02:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently been going through the edit history of the Calvary Chapel wiki page, it seems there is a non-NPOV situation that has brewed. In fact, most of the page has been revitalized over the last few years, where many of the criticisms of the church no longer exist -- in spite of them being fully referenced. If you are still an active user, please feel free to comment on the page. Sliceofmiami (talk) 00:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]