User talk:Durruti36

Trying to move Julian the Apostate

Within a week, I am going post a new request to move the article. Please be ready to come in with support again. Thegreyanomaly (talk)

I have submitted the request to move the page Thegreyanomaly (talk) 01:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Your recent editing history at Dae Gak shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. City Of Silver 22:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was just coming here to post this myself - thanks City.Tao2911 (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my response on City's talk page. --Durruti36 (talk) 22:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sock investigation

There is a sock puppet investigation involving you here.Tao2911 (talk) 00:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This a transparent example of a "bad faith" sockpuppet accusation made on the basis of absolutely zero evidence. --Durruti36 (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't generate the investigation, but I thought I would be thoughtful enough to let you know about it. Your welcome. The evidence is that you edit warred on the Dae Gak page and have tried for months to whitewash it; lately you tried to include promotional material for books that aren't even yet published, and add weasel wording about sex abuse allegations that weren't in the sources, and otherwise violated BLP guidelines, especially with puffery. You wouldn't engage other editors reasonably. You really do seem to get a bit hysterical about this topic. Plus, the day you stopped editing there, another editor ID was created and picked up making the same edits, and then another one, in classic sockpuppet pattern. it's a reasonable conclusion for you to be investigated. If they aren't your socks, then you have nothing to worry about.Tao2911 (talk) 01:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]