User talk:Dunny29

This is Dunny29's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tropical cyclone naming. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:CycloneYoris, yeah i see you're disputing my contributions... Dunny29 (talk) 07:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Dunny29, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! User3749 (talk) 08:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert these AfD closes

Hi,

Please can you revert these closes?

They should have been closed by an admin and, in all 3 cases, the discussion hadn't been running for 7 days. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, but I thought the closure time on AFDs was 5 days. I’ll be careful in handling it in the future. Dunny29 (talk) 10:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Are you happy to undo the closes? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dunny29, you need to review the guidelines of WP:NAC. The only AFDs that a non-admin should close are ones where there is an overwhelming consensus to keep the article. A no consensus closure should never happen after only 7 days (much less 5); the AFD would be relisted in order to extend the time to build consensus. And a non-admin cannot close a discussion as Delete because the non-admin cannot then proceed to delete the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Having been a registered Wikipedia editor for less than two months, you may not yet have the proper experience to be involve in WP:NAC. Please consider contributing in other ways more until you learn the ropes better. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Ronald Dennis

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ronald Dennis. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Mohd Shahrul Chankui

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mohd Shahrul Chankui. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dunny29 if you close another AFD again, I will request a block of your account at ANI. VAXIDICAE💉 14:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Closings

Hi Dunny, I'm Barkeep49, an editor and administrator. Closing AfDs requires a fair amount of skill and have set procedures. Even very experienced non-administrators are limited in what they should close. The two closes mentioned above did not follow guidelines and procedures. Please refrain from closing future AfDs and instead consider participating. Further inappropriate closes such as this may result in a block or other action taken against you. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Burnham Beeches Golf Club. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dunny29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account was blocked without warning. Anyone care to explain why? I didn't edit after I was warned about he AFD closures and made no further edits and the IP I used to log in from was a shared one. Dunny29 (talk) 06:39, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed to WeatherPerson26 (at least), with no doubt. Yamla (talk) 11:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dunny29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account was unfairly blocked by an editor with a long history of blocking new users and IP addresses at random. Dunny29 (talk) 10:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This appeal doesn't address your block or your behaviour, just the admin who imposed it. That's no grounds for an appeal. Cabayi (talk) 11:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dunny29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think people like you take this sockpuppetry thing way too seriously. You ought help contribute to the projuect insetead and assume a little good faith in us. Because you've been no help, I'll have no choice but to edit with another account. If you're annoyed I'm still editing, then that's too bad. Wikipedia is a free webpage and you have no right to coerce us from editing and treat WP as if it's your own personal playground. Dunny29 (talk) 13:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. stwalkerster (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.