User talk:Dumrovii

Welcome...

Hello, Dumrovii, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Bash Kash (talk) 02:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual Innuendo?

Regarding your edit here, could you tell me what sexual innuendo you were talking about? I've since reinstated the edit, as it was a vandalism warning. Perhaps you might wish to take some more time reading posts before making comments on them. And if you are "reporting me", please let me know where you are doing so. I am sure the good folk there would love to hear what you thought was wrong there. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, what precisely is your connection to Parable1991? Typically, one doesn't remove comments off of other user's talk pages. I eagerly await your explanation. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Touch my edit again and color it like something else, and I will almost certainly report you, sunshine. Learn the difference between chastisement (yes, go ahead and look it up...I will wait...). The next time an edit like these (1, 2) - which constitutes a violation of Wikipedia's personal attacks policy - appears again, you will be taking a nice long break from Wikipedia. That is not a threat, it is a promise. Ask Parable 1991 - he didn't believe me either. Look where that got him. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 07:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

A thread has been started regarding your behavior and your likely sockpuppetry here. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dumrovii (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for "sockpuppetery". However, the policy defining sockpuppetery means "Improper purposes include attempts to deceive or mislead other editors" In which I didn't notice that. Therefore I requested to be unblocked. Dumrovii (talk) 23:19, 27 September 2014(UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request to be unblocked for a number of reasons, including that you made it using an IP address and faked the signature. PhilKnight (talk) 05:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You mislead other users by pretending to be multiple users, because they believed in "one user, one account." Also, you were editing disruptively by your "anthrax" and "innuendo" edit summaries, which are worth a block in and of themselves. Origamite^ⓣⓒ 23:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]