User talk:Duke33
Welcome
[edit]I saw that no one has officially welcomed you to the site, so let me be the first to say hello and welcome to the site. --ZeWrestler Talk 17:06, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Tommie Frazier
[edit]Thanks for your input on Tommie Frazier! It is common among college football coach articles to include an external link to schools where the coach currently and previously has coached. It's left there for reference purposes and is useful for those who research college football history. I reverted the edit and placed the link back.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Harold Miner article
[edit]I see that you recently removed the source information from the Harold Miner article, due to the the fact that the web link to the source article in the Los Angeles Times was no longer valid. Unfortunately, though, removing the entire source information like that then leaves the article completely unsourced, which is not satisfactory. If a linked web page is found to be dead, it's better to simply remove the web link from the source listing, rather than remove the entire source listing. I've gone ahead and done that now. 12.155.58.181 (talk) 19:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleting article on Paxus Calta
[edit]Dearest Duke33:
You asked why the articles about me exists. The question has been asked before and the article was proposed for deletion and the discussion of why it was kept is here
After this decision and some conversations with the adminstrator who proposed it be deleted, i edited it back quite a bit. And he was satisfied with these edits and said if they had been in place before he proposed the deletion, it would not have been necessary to propose it - see here
Earlier on when i was editing this article, in part to teach myself about wikipedia, i was introduced to the rules about editing articles about yourself, which is not prohibited. It is basically prohibited to start an article about yourself, which i did not do. See here
So you could propose to delete it again, if you really wanted to. Since not long after the last proposal to delete, i have mostly stayed out of this article and some others have edited it.
I've been in discussions about several articles about personalities and their encyclopedic worth, generally being an author is enough. You are of course free to edit the article and cut it back as you see appropriate.
And i am happy to talk with you more about this if you like --Paxuscalta (talk) 02:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Duke33. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Duke33. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Duke33. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Duke33. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)