User talk:Duende-Poetry

"Night, the mother of fear and mystery, was coming upon me," -- H.G. Wells

Why is cyberpower678 behaving in such a bizarre manner towards me?

I understand I am new to Wiki, but all my edits have been performed in good faith and suddenly tonight this Wiki user, cyberpower678, has not only begun "granting" me permission to edit, but responding in my talk section with lines like "No response so far..." and "There is one final question that I want answered and then I will leave you alone" when I did not respond in a timely manner. Suddenly the talk section on Talk:Aka Manto is looking like a personal conversation, which isn't my intention. All I want to do is work on making the Japanese folklore section better. Is there anything that can be?Duende-Poetry (talk) 01:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

I just needed to know if you wish to improve the article or not. I'm not hindering you or granting you anything. The article's I am seeing are in my opinion not up to Wikipedia's standards. Since you don't wish to edit it, I will tag it for deletion. That's all. It's not bizarre at all. Your redirect I saw in the beginning was puzzling me. After your justification I provided a suggestion. After more answers, I changed my suggestion. I do not wish to be bizarre. If you wish it, I will leave you alone and proceed with tagging the pages for deletion. I apologize if I seemed strange to you for it is not my intention to be strange.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 01:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

The article has been proposed for deletion. You may still edit the article if you wish. Again I apologize for seeming bizarre. It is not my intention to be strange or impatient.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 01:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

@Assisting Wikipedians. I understand the concern you may have for my recent behavior. I see myself that I may have pestered this user to much and left a wrong impression. I would appreciate discussing any further concerns on my talk page. Thanks. This user is going offline, hence the red signature.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 02:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

I think, Cyberpower, that you should just keep your distance. You were a little demanding in your tone and we don't usually insist users respond and respond and respond, but this is a far cry from some of the vindictive stuff I see and you have acknowledged you overstepped a bit. So everyone: stand down and go about your peaceful ways! Despite your note at the discussion to Duefde, we do not block users for things like good faith redirections (not that I think that was a bad idea here at all, by the way). I looked for a copyvio from the kids site but didn't see any actual cut and pasting, but the topic doesn't appear capable of being referenced to any reliable source. By the way Duende, I noticed you are calling Wikipedia "wiki" a lot. This is another in a long line of things we don't block users for but it is painful:-)--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:19, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Will do.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 10:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you SineBot, I realized that am going back to fix these things. Cheers! Duende-Poetry (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Yama-bito prefix:Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Yama-bito prefix:Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Talk:Yama-bito. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Talk:Yama-bito - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:Talk:Yama-bito|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. andy (talk) 22:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC) Dear Andy, Thank you very much for your quick reply. I am sorry if, being new to Wiki editing, I perhaps created a page I did not mean to. What I was hoping to do was get the title of the article I was working on "Yama-bito" changed to "Yamabito" (without the hyphen) I attempted to do that through the Move button, but because there was already a Yamabito page that was a redirect, I got stuck. The original article seemed to confuse the actual people Yamabito with, as far as I could tell, some anime or manga about shape-shifters that played fast and loose with Japanese history. In the dozen or so articles I read about the Yamabito, including the original Japanese historian Yanagita who recorded the stories in the first place, ever called them Yama-bito. I know this might seem like a small problem in the grand scope of things, which is why I attempted to fix it on my own ... creating, perhaps, more of a problem than I expected. If there is anyway I can fix this, I certainly will (cut and paste the re-edited article to the Yamabito re-direct page?) Either way, thanks again for your help.Duende-Poetry (talk) 22:22, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Aka Manto has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 23:26, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Duende-Poetry. You have new messages at Talk:Aka Manto.
Message added 01:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

No response so far... —cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 01:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

There is one final question that I want answered and then I will leave you alone.—cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 01:34, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Miko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Nara, Kamakura, Meiji, Heian, Jinja and Cleansing

List of legendary creatures from Japan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Creatures and Legendary

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you DPLbot, I was totally unaware I had done that, but I'll work hard to make sure it doesn't happen again. Cheers! Duende-Poetry (talk) 11:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Hotoke

Hi, Duende-Poetry. A couple of lines about your changes to the article Hotoke.

I reverted the article to its previous form for two reasons: the first is that you are obviously a new user. You cannot tag with "Citation needed" every single unreferenced sentence, even when it says the obvious, it is supported by a link or it is self-explanatory, as the one saying "the same kanji is used for France". That France is written with 仏 surely doesn't need supporting evidence. (I did add a reference today where I thought it was truly necessary.) "Toward A Working Definition" is not an acceptable title in a Wikipedia article. Words in section titles shouldn't be capitalized.

Second, a bulleted list is a good format when it's essential to draw attention to differences. You do make a good point about "The performing of a Buddhist memorial service". I fixed that too.

If you wish I am available for discussion, either here or in my talk page, but I think that, before making major revisions, you should be sure you know all ropes. Take care. - Frank (Urashima Tarō) (talk) 23:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for writing. I've been operating under two concepts Wikipedia seems to promote: Be Bold and Cite Your Sources. For example, the article in question Hotoke was nothing more than a laundry list of vague claims about this certain aspect of Buddhism. So I went bold, for to me that page needed organization and it needed proof to show this just wasn't original research. That's why I put because everything on that page seems to be original research. And as for citing kanji, it won't be the first time that the English-version of a Japanese article misspelled things in translation. I can't see how reverting back what I did helps either of those two at all. Whether or not you like "Toward A Working Definition" or not, it was simply an attempt to organize, knowing I could come back later when I had better information and rework it some more. Editing takes a long time and since this is all volunteer work, it is discouraging when one finds ones work reverted, not because of vandalism or that the laundry list was a superior organization to the more traditional page layout Wikipedia promotes, but apparently because 1) I'm a "new user" and 2) words in titles shouldn't be capitalized. My purpose of being here is to help make the best articles on Japanese folklore that I can. If reverting my changes is what you consider a good use of our time, so be it, there will always be other articles to edit. Cheers. Duende-Poetry (talk) 03:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Credit where credit is due

"When bad English Comp teachers die they are forced to edit Wikipedia pages for all eternity, placing after every other word."

is this original with you, or did you find it somewhere? DS (talk) 17:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

August 2012

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Talk:Kasa-obake, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wylve (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)