User talk:Dudhhr/Archive/2023/June

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Geo Varghese Peter

Hello Dudhhr. I am just letting you know that I deleted Geo Varghese Peter, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which didn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: CES Records

Hello Dudhhr, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of CES Records, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Correction Mistake

Hey there! I received your message regarding an edit to centering prayer. As an expert in this area, and to maintain neutrality on the topic, it is significantly more neutral to state "claims to be" (my edit) rather than a definitive statement as "is" as was previously on page. Due to the increasing amount of articles, studies, and information out and continuing to be released showing that it is not what it claims to be. Therefore, "claims to be" is the most neutral statement. Thanks! Curdie of the Cross (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

@Curdie of the Cross: The use of "claims to be" should be avoided per MOS:CLAIM. Information regarding criticism of the method is provided in the relevant section of the article. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Interesting. Thank you for explaining. This certainly makes it far more difficult to provide true neutrality. 162.213.240.179 (talk) 17:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Article was very helpful. Thank you! 162.213.240.179 (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)