User talk:Dudewing

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 03:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Game end

Hello Dudewing,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TomCat4680 and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Game end for deletion, because the article appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important-enough and/or recognized-enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TomCat4680}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Thanks,

TomCat4680 (talk) 02:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Game end

Hello, Dudewing,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Game end! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please work on this in draftspace and move back to the mainspace when it's ready.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Game end moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Game end, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 08:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ili_Kazakh_Autonomous_Prefecture#Governar

Hello! Could you help me to find chinese original name for Governar № 5,6,7 in link above?--Kaiyr (talk) 10:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Hydromania (talk) 03:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Game end

Hello, Dudewing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Game end.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts, please read

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:03, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to mark major edits as minor 20 days after your warning

This has to stop now if you don't want to be blocked. Most of them are not minor and your edit to Antifa, unsourced and heavily discussed on the talk page and adding a word (terrorist) that we should only use with great care and excellent sources, was clearly a very major edit. Ironically this edit[1] was a minor edit but you didn't mark it as minor. Doug Weller talk 12:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marking major edits as minor

STOP marking all of your edits as minor, as you've been repeatedly warned. It's disruptive. OrgoneBox (talk) 03:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --OrgoneBox (talk) 17:19, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 17:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]