User talk:Ducati748

Just because Slovenia agrees with the call does not mean there wasn't universal criticism of the call. Slovenia is operating from a bias viewpoint. Everyone else in the world thinks he made a bad call or was perhaps taking money. Also, you should not add the word "some" to the article, because everyone thinks he made the wrong call. You justified this by saying that it is a US position, but that is not true. The whole world believes that except for slovenia.

January 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Spoon, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. SENATOR2029 talk 14:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Jung, and others.

Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies & Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and cease making constant changes to BLP's without discussing them first, and using edit summaries for communication. There is no conspiracy against Asians born in the US being called American, the simple fact is people like Jessica Jung are clearly notable for being Korean, there is no evidence to suggest she has American citizenship or considers herself exclusively American in the article as it stands. She lives in Korea, became notable in Korea, and works in Korea. There is a distinct lack of reason in Jessica Jung's article to suggest why she should even be called Korean American, but I have changed it to this simply because there is no evidence to suggest what she prefers to be known as or what citizenship she has. That is why I have requested sources to be found to clear up the matter of her nationality. One thing for sure, her Korean identity and justification for its inclusion in the lead section is not in doubt. Please familiarise yourself with the relevant guidelines. --Τασουλα (talk) 20:32, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal opinions and wild accusations do not trump policy (but frankly, I don't care whether you think there is some conspiracy against Asian American's or not). And you have not come up with any sources to assert your claims whatsoever (i.e the passport part). The aggressive nature of your posts is also getting on my nerves. Can you calm it down? ^_^...and I never said she wasn't American, I'm saying there is a lack of evidence to suggest she is in accordance with policy... --Τασουλα (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Jung's Korean identity is clearly integral to her notability here. Stop your tedious, disruptive editing. I tried to be nice, but your refusal to communicate makes talking on friendly terms impossible. Go ahead and remove the Korean part if you want - if it so offends you, for whatever reason, I wont bother reverting again because I have no time for this. And kindly don't come into contact with me again; it will be treated as unwelcome. Sheesh. --Τασουλα (talk) 17:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Choo-Sin Sin-Shoo Choo-Shoo-Sin something or other...

I've moved the page back to what it originally was. If you object to that, you are more than welcome to request a move but moving it back again would be ill-advised, given that he is normally known as Shin-Soo Choo. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 03:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a move request here. Regards, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 04:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit summary for one of your recent edits of Choo Shin-Soo, you are kindly asked to refrain from using "you" when possible, and direct your comments at the content of articles. Please comment on the article's talk page to build consensus on the article's name. Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Shin-Soo Choo. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ducati748 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Choo Shin-soo is his name and not the other way around. This "consensus" that is referred to in this Wikipedia is by a group of Eurocentrists who have no knowledge of non-European naming conventions, especially those from East Asia. Someone has posted that because Major League Baseball and English-written publications (presumably in the USA) refer to the player as Shin-soo Choo, that's the way it should be. That would be very a naive and ignorant (prejudiced) conclusion. The last time I checked, English wikipedia is not the American or European Wikipedia. English is a global language, hence there are thousands of English-written articles from around the world (particularly in East Asia) that refer to the person as Choo Shin-soo or Choo Shinsoo, not Shin-soo Choo. Here are some clear examples: ?UNIQ972fd99da0c84113-nowiki-00000021-QINU?1?UNIQ972fd99da0c84113-nowiki-00000022-QINU?; ?UNIQ972fd99da0c84113-nowiki-00000024-QINU?2?UNIQ972fd99da0c84113-nowiki-00000025-QINU?; ?UNIQ972fd99da0c84113-nowiki-00000027-QINU?3?UNIQ972fd99da0c84113-nowiki-00000028-QINU? Additionally, Ryu Hyun-jin, a pitcher for the LA Dodgers, is listed (correctly) as Ryu Hyun-jin in wikipedia. Are you going to change that too? Ducati748 (talk) 20:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Tiptoety ^talk 21:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]