User talk:DubstepKing2010
March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GEORGIEGIBBONS has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Hamtechperson 20:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Blocked for disruption
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.For your repeated disruption at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GEORGIEGIBBONS despite being told not to. –MuZemike 20:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Make that indefinite as you were just Confirmed as a sock of GEORGIEGIBBONS. You're not fooling anyone. –MuZemike 21:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
DubstepKing2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm not GEORGIE, I'm the DubstepKing2010 and your user checker is wrong
Decline reason:
Direct CU hit. Attacking the CU's integrity or person isn't gonna help your cause in the slightest. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 18:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.