User talk:Dubhagan/May 2006

Mistakes on World Wrestling Entertainment roster

Hello JFred. I noticed some mistakes on the WWE roster, but I am unable to edit it as it is protected.

Trish Stratus is listed under inactive, but is out of alphabetical order. But I’m not sure Trish should be listed under inactive yet as the injury was last night and it is unknown what the injury is or if she will miss any ring time at all.
Lance Storm – per this evidence, Storm is in fact returning to WWE for the ECW brand; but not full-time. Maybe we should start a part-time wrestlers/non-wrestlers section for ECW?
Tracey Taylor - she is now contracted per this; she should be listed under Deep South Wrestling’s contracted list if she isn’t already.

Thanks for taking this into consideration -- 216.78.95.162 21:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers One and Three are fixed, but I read the actual commentary from Storm and he doesn't actually say he officially signed on, only that an interest is shown on both sides for his involvement. In order for him to fully commit, WWE will have to work around his time at his wrestling academy. I will however, move him to the "offered contract" section. --JFred 22:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you fix the section under Ohio Valley Wrestling's contracted section, the females section. It lists Victoria (Swimwear Model) but it goes to a disambiguation page. 209.214.140.200 23:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

X11 colors

I replied to your question on Talk:Web_colors#X11_Color_Names. Notinasnaid 06:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Alumni Page Questions

David Fliar signed a delepomental contract in 2001/2002 and was released in October 2002 so he should be listed under D. Wasn't Gorrila Monsoon employed by the WWF when he died? BionicWilliam 05:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Money in the Bank keeps being added WWE Page Championship Section like its a Title

Do you consider it a title like Royal Rumble/King of the Ring or just an contract?

Mark Henry

No formal announment has been made so in my fucking opinion he is still managed. --DJ BatWave

World Wrestling Entertainment roster

Could you fix a couple of mistakes?

Shelly Martinez is listed under OVW as well as on the SmackDown! brand. If she moved from OVW to SmackDown! then she needs to be removed from the OVW list.
WWE has signed Nick Postl also known as Shortstack to a contract and is going to be managing Finlay now. He needs to be added to the managers/part-time wrestlers section.
Since Nunzio is going to reform the FBI in ECW, maybe that means Nunzio should be added to the ECW brand.

216.78.95.104 23:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and Dave Taylor is the name of a DSW trainer if he's not already on the roster page, he might need to be added. 216.78.95.218 23:48, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Shelly has been removed from OVW, and I've added Shortstack. As for Nunzio to ECW, since there is the possibility of many current RAW, SmackDown! and developmental wrestlers that can be moved to ECW, we should wait for confirmation by WWE on who on those rosters will be moved over before we move wrestlers over. As for Dave Taylor, if you scroll down further, you'll see him under the heading of Trainers and Road Agents. Oh, and please don't erase others comments placed on my talk page. --JFred 03:15, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changes: Could you add Chris Chetti and Mikey Whipwreck to the "In negotiation" section in ECW and Joel Gertner to the Main roster "Male" section because he has signed a contract with WWE? DG X 20:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 12:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You expressed interest in a wikicommunity for Aspergian. You may be interested in User:Salix alba/Association of Wikipedians with Mental Health Conditions or wikisanians which is the begining of starting to get such a community going. To get it going we need a few poeple to express support at WP:List of proposed projects. --Salix alba (talk) 07:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: TNA Roster

Thanks for the heads up, I guess I've kind of been out of it a little lately. -Darryl Hamlin 00:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme Championship Wrestling (WWE)

Damn JFred ... your beating me to the punch on the ECW stuff .... lol Kyros 20:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JFred .... I think the ECW as a third brand needs a major rewrite ... alot of it's unneccesary such as all the build up and WWE staff was surprised he said that. What do you think? Kyros 22:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh..

I wasn't sure, I remember his match with Haas, but couldn't rememeber which name he used. DG X 21:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. I must have taken it off by accident while reverting the massive amount of vandalism by the IP's that occur all day. BTW, I requested the page be protected. It seems like this page is a hot spot for vandalism. One more thing, don't you think we should group all of the inactive talent in one section since we don't know if Shannon Moore, Akio, Test and others are for sure going to that brand it's listed under. It would also solve the minor dispute there of where to list JBL, Chavo and MNM to which brand they are going to. I'll do it and see how it looks... DG X 21:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have it in Preview and it looks fine except for the wording next to the inactive wrestlers like "inactive for brand" and such. Want me to hit the save button?

I think this way could potentially be better. Instead of wrestlers being inactive for thier brand, I think we should place them under whatever brand they are wrestling for right then. Like Dupree, he shouldn't be under the inactive because he isn't, he's wrestling somewhere (I don't know which OVW or DSW). But like I said, it will solve the problem of situations like where to place recently signed talent like Test and Shannon Moore. What do you think? DG X 22:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually not listed there. If I placed it there it would be like a brand, which it's not technically. Since the page format is set out:

Main Brands
Developmental Brands
Non-contracted
Stable/Tag teams
Others

Instead of making it where Inactive would be part of the main brands, I was thinking of inserting the Inactive list like its own section between Developmental and stables. I am also considering instead of a seperate section for those non-contracted; to place them in a sub-section of which brand they are wrestling for. Well, I guess its better explained once you see it.. DG X 22:19, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do you like the changes (I hit save). DG X 22:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, glad you like it. Now all we need is to get the IP addresses to like it. ;-) DG X 22:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ECW on Sci Fi

I mentioned it on the project talk page about creating the article. Either way, it's not much a problem. At least it's all sorted out now. Thanks very much for the help. --Oakster ^(Talk) 21:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Raaber

I don't think Chris Raaber ever signed a contract to WWE. On his offical webpage, it states he recieved a try-out match, but nothing more about him and WWE. I think I'm going to remove him until I see evidence of him signing a contract. And I just found a sight that said he was wrestling in EWA (whatever promotion that is), so I'm sure he isn't contracted. DG X 23:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, from all the sites I just read, apparently Chris Raaber signed a contract on 1/26/06 but from there until about March 2006 his contract status was unknown. He apparently DID sign on with WWE but before going to EWA, he had to be released from WWE (probably in February). I'll add Raaber to the Alimni page and mark his release date as February 2006 so it's fairly accurate. DG X 23:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I guess we can remove Lash from the curent roster and Raaber from the Alumni page then. DG X 01:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beth Phoenix.

Thanks for the heads up about Beth's article. I moved it to the correct name. --LBMixPro ^<Sp ^e ^ak|on|it!> 00:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Female

FIRST OF ALL THEY ARE NOT FULL-TIME WRESTLERS THERE ARE PART-TIME WRESTLERS

ALSO LITA SHE IS NOT A FULL WRESTLER SHE IS A PART-TIME WRESTLER

IF THEY WERE FULL-TIME WRESTLERS WE WOULD'VE HAVE SHARMELL AND JILLIAN IN MATCHES BUT WE HAVEN'T BECAUSE SHARMELL IS A NON-WRESTLER AND JILLIAN HALL IS A PART-TIME WRESTLER

MELINA

OK THAT IS FINE BUT MELINA IS NOT A PART-TIME WRESTLER NOW SHE IS IN THE WOMEN'S DIVISION

done

fine that is how it should be

Women's Division

Ok, but just so it's consistant witht the rest of the sections, I renamed them all to the Men's Division and Women's Division to all brands. DG X 04:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think we were going for offical names here. I thought we were just specifying the gender category. Although its the "offical" name, I'm sure in other brands, they would use the term "Women's Division" during thier match play-by-play. FWIW, it might not be worth mentioning the offical names like that on the roster page. All it's going to cause is other people to change it. Just wanna use male/female? DG X 04:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the headache. ;-) DG X 04:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

;-), no problem, I will leave like it is for a few days until we get more feedback. DG X 04:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ECW WWE Clean Up

I think I just cleaned up the ECW 2 article. Take a long and tell me what you think. 09:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Drew/Dorian

Then why does gerweck.net list them as two differant people? DG X 19:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see. If you look at pictures of the two, they look identical. DG X 19:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WWE roster (again)

I'm going to remove some names from the WWE roster, like the camera men and a few of the non-notable backstage personnel. Some people should be noted, but people we know that aren't going to be announced when they leave like Johnny the camera man from SmackDown! are released, it's not worth having. I'll add a list of names here to let you review it when I'm done. DG X 02:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking into it, but it appears that some of the creative team in WWE isn't even employeed anymore. I'll look deeper into this.. DG X 02:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. Ok, I haven't removed the camera guys yet, but I have removed the surgeons and a few of the creative team members. I looked through and made sure they were released before I removed them. If you like I can provide a source for almost all of them. DG X 02:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ;-) DG X 03:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maximos

The Maximos were offically signed by WWE. Check by Google and you find on many wrestling forums, they have been contracted. DG X 19:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I'm about to fix that little dispute about male/female who is who debate in one edit. I'm getting rid of all the little categories (announcers, referees) and making them into one section. If we don't have a men's division and Women's division, then lets just combine them and place text next to those who aren't wrestlers. See roster. DG X 19:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DGX RUINED EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DO SOMETHING HE PUT ANNOUNCERS, REFEREES AND RINGA NNOUNCERS AS MALES AND FEMALES HE MESSED IT UP

TELL HIM TO STOP AND PUT EVERYTHING BACK TO NORMAL

please can you stop taping in caps we can see what your writing without it. and JFred i would personally like to ask you to please don't change it, i know you dont "own" the page but you do make lots of edits on it but with it this way it puts to rest the whole part time wrestlers, divas and so and so. I dont see why everything on the page has to be to the liking of justmaria. Your prob fed up with the whole part times wrestlers and stuff and but this is the only way to stop all that. I agree wit DGX on this, it looks fine how it is now and put to rest the arguing Lil crazy thing 20:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was just in an edit war with JustMaria over a section posted like the one you just posted. Could we discuss before readding? DG X 21:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And why can't we make it Male talent and Female talent. Male female could imply to wrestlers only, but it could aslo just mean the gender. DG X 21:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the Maximo's are contracted [1]. DG X 22:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Maximos: That makes no since. That would mean all the others under ECW would have to be added to Inactive --> other since we got confirmation from other forums just like the above situation. DG X 22:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About the Subsections

JFRED please leave it like it was like there was part-time wrestlers and non-wrestlers then there was the subsection for interviewers and announcers it was much easier and 'Cleaner' like this

Sincerly,

JustMaria

WHO CARES

look it was much easier to search for people when there was sub section like i told u earlier do not listen to DGX b/c the way he want it is so confusing

my comment

have u looked my comment i left

isn't that much better?

Also

IT'S TRUE GO TO LORDSOFPAIN.NET AND FIND OUT

thanks

ok i get it thanks though