User talk:Dtolson1/sandbox
Peer Review
[edit]Additions look appropriate and well sourced, and the inclusion of the alternate MIS 19 comparison seems interesting. I didn't notice and grammatical issues, and the narrative is clear and easy to follow. I agree that a chart or image of some sort would be beneficial, especially since the one already on the page is just the 5.5 million-year span of the record, and not annotated in any way to show where the MIS falls in the timeline. Jmead2 (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
quick feedback
[edit]This looks great. nice work. I look forward to seeing the final product. You could also edit pages discussing the early anthropocene hypothesis by including links to your new content on the MIS 11 page. Answer.to.the.rock (talk) 15:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)