User talk:Dtimberlake

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dtimberlake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The user Bhambel's account is a different individual from user dtimberlake.

Decline reason:

However, it appears to be the same, as you have made the same edits as that account and User:WindarProd. How do you explain these similarities? TN X Man 17:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dtimberlake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edits made with that account were wrongfully posted, Misspelled title, no references... The user WindarProd, Bhambel is a co-worker of mine who also adds information to the wiki page.

Decline reason:

The statement that these editors are your co-workers does not explain why they have made the same edits. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|reason}} The edits made with that account were wrongfully posted, Misspelled title, no references... The user WindarProd, Bhambel is a co-worker of mine who also adds information to the wiki page.}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dtimberlake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edits made with that account were wrongfully posted, Misspelled title, no references... The user WindarProd, Bhambel is a co-worker of mine who also adds information to the wiki page.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Dtimberlake (talk) 18:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I understand what i was blocked for and will not continue to cause damage or disruption wikipedia}}

Are you conceding, by this posting, that the users WindarProd and Bhambel are in fact yourself? If so, you are admitting sock/meat puppetry. If not, how can you guarantee their behaviour? --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dtimberlake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Those usernames were not created by me, thus i cannot guarantee their behavior. I can inform the other two users in my office of wikipedia procedures and prevent them from recurring.

Decline reason:

Identical edits mean either WP:MEAT, but mor elikely WP:SOCK. As unblock requests continue to fail to address this, merely repeating the same issue, talkpage access is being removed (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:36, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]