User talk:Dt128/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Contents

United World Chart

Please do not add the United World Chart, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 15:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Girls Aloud discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please take your reason for deleting the St Trinian's single to the talk page before deleting it again. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 23:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Copsandrobbers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Copsandrobbers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Dancing on Ice (Series 4), makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Smjg (talk) 12:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

UK R&B chart

Hi, thats fair enough, I noticed an article called The Official UK R&B Chart had been created when it already existed at UK R&B Chart. I just tried to transfer some of the information but its ok with me if you remove it. Stevvvv4444 (talk) 17:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Gaga discography

Stop deleting valid information. Violating like this, you will be reported. --Legolas ^(talktome) 13:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Ahhh, now i understood. Basically you are only keeping charts where the album has a good peak. Well Wkpedia doesnot go for good peaks or anything, it should have the correct information even if the peak is a low one. Please don't delete them. --Legolas ^(talktome) 13:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

When it comes to discography pages, it best to stick to 8-10 countries (the ones with the biggest music industries). Not Japan, since we don't have reliable sources for that country. Then you mention the peaks in these countries regardless of how they charted. If they didn't chart at all, you leave the box empty or use a dash. — R² 13:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I never said you did add Japan charts, I'm just speaking in general terms. — R² 14:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Please comment here, further edit warring will result in blocks, so let's get chatting instead. — R² 14:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gaga - Just Dance UK.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Gaga - Just Dance UK.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

No its not. Except for the picture being a little bright, there's nothing different in it. Why are you asking me? You are not the one who added it. *Shrug* --Legolas ^(talktome) 04:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

AD discography

here good links: MOS:DISCOG--Aaa16 (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Merriweather discography

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Daniel Merriweather discography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cannibaloki 16:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Aleshadixon maxi single.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Aleshadixon maxi single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:The Priests

Template:The Priests has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 01:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Beautiful Dirty Rich.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Beautiful Dirty Rich.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:TaylorSwiftLoveStory.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TaylorSwiftLoveStory.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Why?

Green Day discography - why did you do this edit? Look at the table now, it's tiny and totally unreadable. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 09:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Lol... that's okay. I just thought it was strange that you left it that way. All good now. :) k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 09:32, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:TaylorSwiftLoveStory.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:TaylorSwiftLoveStory.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Duffy discography/archive1

I'm sorry that your FLC is languishing because of lack of reviewers. Do you know any good WikiProjects you could notify? For example, I asked at WP Discogs. Drewcifer3000 (talk · contribs) is also a good discography reviewer. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lalala.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lalala.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DELUXE EP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:DELUXE EP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Will Young singles

Template:Will Young singles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 10:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Big Brother 2009 (UK)

Please do not re-add the nominations totals table. This has been removed after a recent discussion on the article's talk page. Thanks, DJ 20:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC).

Yes. DJ 20:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Duffy Steppingstone.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Duffy Steppingstone.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Solange Knowles discography

Your recent edits were reverted back to my version. The reason is listed below,

• Album titles are not bold case
• References need to go beside Album information at the top of Albums
• References need to go beside Song at top of Singles
• Hot R&B Airplay is a component charts.[1] and does not need to be added back alongside the other charts.

So in retrospect, you might need to cut down on the Solange edits. You have edited the back on 20x in a row.[2] Also when editting a page, don't go back over again and again making minor edits to improve your contributions and preferences. When you edit, use the preview button below or go to the sandbox for testing. Lovejonesfly (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I would advise you to listen. If you revert the page, it could end in your blocking. Lovejonesfly (talk) 16:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

You have been warned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovejonesfly (talk • contribs) 16:46, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I have nicely warned you, to not revert the page. You are now being reported for disruptive edits. Lovejonesfly (talk) 14:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey there. I'll be the first to admit that discographies aren't my area of expertise on Wikipedia, but, I do help out with a lot of disputes so I was wondering if I could be of service here. You and Lovejonesfly seem to have a disagreement over the way a discography is supposed to be formatted - is that correct? Could we all agree to talk about the difference and find a way to work out the issue? Shell ^babelfish 15:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I have reverted the article to the last undisputed version and protected it for one week to prevent further disruption from this edit war. Please go to the talk page, discuss your issues with the article and come to an agreement about how to proceed. Papa November (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Dt128. You have new messages at Shell Kinney's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AfD nomination of Jade Ewen discography

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jade Ewen discography, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Ewen discography. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Comment

Report Me! But I don't know what you are going to report seeing how my edits are valid. But let's take a look at yours. If your edits were correct, then they wouldn't be getting reverted by Papa November and they wouldn't be nominated for deletion like the one above (AfD nomination of Jade Ewen discography), which you were involved in. So check yourself before you personally attack me again. Because I could go ahead and report now (again) for disruptive edits and personally attacking instead of reasonally contacting me. But your so quick to get angry about everything, you don't even see the fault in your own edits. It doesn't matter what other discography pages have because they could be wrong to (did you ever figure that!). I've tried to help out of good faith but you love to provoke. So go ahead and report me but it will end in your blocking. When I reported you before, the admins tried to have mercy on you, Shell babelfish and I tried to talk to you reasonable. But you still reverted the page anyway and then Papa November reverted it back to my edits and protected the page because you wanted to act up. The fact is I'm being nice and trying to fix what you've done, sometimes ref goes beside it but it really depends. Lovejonesfly (talk) 21:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Just to clarify, I reverted the article back to before the two of you started fighting over it. I am not advocating either version. Please discuss it like adults. If you can't come to an agreement, then go to dispute resolution and ask for help. Papa November (talk) 21:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

If case you haven't noticed, I have been discussing it like an adult. And once again, I can care less about the Solange Knowles disc., so do whatever with it. You can't have a dispute resolution if you and DT128 are only ones editting it. Oh yeah, we're not fighting over the page, but I did use it as an example. Now please, both of you, do me a favor and stop consulting me, I've got work to do and can't do it if you two keep interrupting me. Lovejonesfly (talk) 21:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2