User talk:Dspark76

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dspark76! I am Glacier Wolf and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Glacier Wolf 03:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RIT

Hey, thanks for working on the RIT article. Here's a few friendly tips - generally, you shouldn't have external links to websites outside of wikipedia. You can usually add references using the ref tag, or you can add it to the external links section. I'll be trying to remove many of the external links. Also, make sure you use the Preview button instead of Saving the page. You should always try to limit the number of consecutive edits you make. try to combine them into one, that way it doesn't clog the history section with only edits you've made. Let me know if you have any questions :) --Dan Leveille^TALK 20:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the top of every page is an "edit this page" link, just use that to edit the entire page. The only difference when you edit a section is that it adds a little arrow and the section in the edit summary, so people who are looking at the history log know that the only changes you've made was to that section. But it's not a big deal. But be bold and feel free to edit things and add your own content! That's what Wikipedia is about. I'm trying to add reliable references to RIT's article, since a lot of the content is uncited. If something's not obvious fact, then it's good to do a google search to see if you can find a reliable source. --Dan Leveille^TALK 21:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

Not a problem. I wanted to give you a Garbage Plate, but Wikipedia doesn't have a welcome template for that. :) Glacier Wolf 03:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, my dad lives in the retirement home by the Port of Rochester in Charlotte. Glacier Wolf 03:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Samantha Smith

Good work. Hopefully we can keep it featured. PMA (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-claims that the KGB had killed her were circulating on American newsgroups just weeks after she died - http://groups.google.com.au/group/net.politics/msg/fed3e2a99de79a04?dmode=source&hl=en —Preceding unsigned comment added by PMA (talk • contribs) 03:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - keep up the good work and I'll help anyway i can - I'm sure there are online newspaper and journal archives that we can use too. Many Soviet people did think the CIA killed her. On the American side many people accused the KGB of killing her for their own purposes PMA (talk) 12:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about "Life before the Letter"? It's interesting how quickly she matured - in '83 she looks so young but just two years later in Lime Street she has really blossomed to "tits and lipstick". PMA (talk) 13:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you feel you should. Keep up the good work - Sam would be happy. PMA (talk) 15:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised there isn't a Samantha Smith Elementary in Maine. PMA (talk) 11:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thera eruption or Minoan eruption

First of all, I'm not a vulcanologist nor do I play one on TV. I forgot how I got involved with that article, but I got it to GA status a few months ago. I still don't know what to name it. It has gone through several titles, not sure which one to choose. Do you have an opinion? BTW, what's this about the garbage plate? Are you from Ra-cha-cha? I lived many years there, doing my internship and residency, along with getting some degree from the U of R. And getting absolutely drunk and having a garbage plate. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 23:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marlin. I left some comments about the garbage plate on your page :)

With respect to the Minoan eruption, I'll admit I'm not a vulcanologist either, but I'm always happy to toss in my 2¢. I think this one is tricky question though. I think its important that the name makes sense when shown in a list of similar eruptions. For example, see Volcanic Explosivity Index List of Eruption. You'll notice that most of the eruptions are described simply by a place name (a mountain, an island, yellow stone park, etc) In this regard, Thera or Santorini seems to work best. However, when a volcano has several major eruptions, then you need to name each one something unique. In this case, Minoan eruption seems to fit. We know that Thera eruppted multiple times, although I haven't seen any estimates for the magnitude of the earlier erruptions. Even still, I edited the VEI page to read Thera (Minoan eruption).

I came across the Minoan eruption article while working on the Location hypotheses of Atlantis, Crete and Santorini section. While doing this work I came across:

"SANTORINI ERUPTION" on http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/how_volcanoes_work/santorini.html
"The Minoan eruption of the Santorini volcano" on http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/columnist/vergano/2006-08-27-ancient-volcano_x.htm
"Santorini eruption" on http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6568053.stm

Digging further to establish the VEI, I found the real volcanologists using:

"Santorini eruption" on http://www.uri.edu/news/releases/?id=3654
"eruption of Thera (Santorini)" on http://www.agu.org/meetings/cc02babstracts/McCoy.pdf
"Minoan eruption" on http://www.uri.edu/endeavor/thera/eruption.html

So, I would conclude that there is no consensus in the media/scientific community. Wikipedia doesnt need to do any better than that but does have the advantage of redirect pages. So, my vote would be to leave it the way it is for now. Dspark76 (talk) 12:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage plates redux

I once sat across the table at Tahou's Lyell from a skinny friend and watched him eat two garbage plates in succession. Eight minutes for the first and about twenty for the second. Scary. Cxw (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage plate userbox

I'd like a parameter so I could have mine say "This user eats garbage plates sometimes" (or maybe reluctantly) :) . Cxw (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The parameter is nice but there's now spurious whitespace below the userbox. Wrap the examples in <noinclude> and that should take care of it. See e.g. Template:Col-2, which uses noinclude to wrap the documentation. Cxw (talk) 14:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Samantha

we were told by someone that claimed to have visited the plot that her and Arthur's ashes were interred/buried in a cometary but i can't find any reference for what Jane Smith did with the cremated ashes. Paul Melville Austin (talk) 12:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Early Years" section has been tagged by an admin - needs verification. Paul Melville Austin (talk) 03:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving text between articles and links

Hi, carrying on our earlier discussion if I want to move a chunk of text from one article to another, how do I indicate it? Thanks.--Doug Weller (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

US stamp copyright

Hi, you are wrong about the copyright status of US postage stamps. Before the USPS was created, they were creations of the US government, and are as universally PD as any other US govt work. Even after the USPS was formed, stamp copyrights were still given over to the govt, and so still became PD everywhere. USPS didn't get to own stamp copyrights until 1979. If you're going to argue for a change, don't just do a handful of stamps and leave it; we have a page Commons:Stamps/Public domain where we document what we know about stamp copyright status, you can bring it up on the talk page there. Stan (talk) 14:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-Stamp}} was kind of a stupid idea (check the history to see that I'm allowed to say that :-) ), it doesn't quote a law or any other justification for PDness. So we don't want it on commons, in fact I have in mind to delete it from en: when all the genuinely PD stamps are moved over to commons. Commons' PD-USGov does mention stamps, but it would make sense to have a PD-USGov-POD or some such just as each branch of the military has its own tag these days. The Eisenhower stamp is fine for Commons because it's from 1969 (yes, the info template could say that, feel free to add - for myself, I "just know" that the Eisenhower stamp is pre-1979), while the sunfish stamp got past me, I just deleted it as copyvio. I agree that stamps should have their dates somewhere in their info, as usual there is quite a variety of data quality in image descriptions. In any case, use PD-USGov instead of PD-Old (it being another deprecated tag, actually). Stan (talk) 00:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch baby pancakes

That's a great photo. Maybe it should be the main one. Now I have to go eat something. Thanks a lot! ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Dutch Baby served with lemon slices, powdered sugar, butter, and a side of bacon

Thanks. This was the first time I had eaten (or even heard of) a Dutch Baby. It was so impressive, I felt compelled to document the occassion with a cell-cam photo. I'm glad you enjoyed it :) Dspark76 (talk) 13:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New userbox for which prefectures of Japan you've visited

A bit of template and image fun. See example at User:Cxw or User_talk:Nihonjoe#New_userbox_for_which_prefectures_you've_visited Cxw (talk) 15:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for The Mill Yard Tract

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Mill Yard Tract , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. AltStikMan (talk) 23:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheWonderfulLeapsOfSamPatch Cover.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:TheWonderfulLeapsOfSamPatch Cover.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Kylie Maybury

Hi.

We worked together to keep Samantha Smith a Featured Article, so I'm hoping you'd be willing to do me a big favour and help me in expanding Murder of Kylie Maybury. I'm also contacting other Wikipedians from the old days to try and help us with Kylie's article. Paul Austin (talk) 16:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bar Harbor Flight 1808 Flight Track.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Bar Harbor Flight 1808 Flight Track.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dspark76. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dspark76. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Douglas Fawcett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theosophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dspark76. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dspark76. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]