User talk:Dsoconno
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Science. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mikenorton (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, Mike Norton, for your comments. I believe, they are misdirected. It is a simple fact that I have not reverted anybody's submission. It is my submission that has been repeatedly reverted without any discussion on the discussion page. Dsoconno (talk) 12:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Statements like the one you added, particularly signed, have no place in an article per WP:SOAPBOX. If you want to discuss the article do so on the talk page. Your addition was inappropriate and was reverted by various editors, the edit warring comes from your reversions of those edits. Mikenorton (talk) 20:16, 21 June 2010 (UTC)