User talk:Dsmurat/Archive 1

Modified images and historical correctness

Thanks for your effort to modify the image. Personally I liked the image. But article aims to tell the user factual information. Touched (modified) images decrease the value of the article. The "authentic" images improve the factual correctness of the content. People do perceived "modified" images as trivializing the content. Historical true would advise you to include the image in the Ataturk's gallery in Commons. That page has been in poor condition for a while. --Rateslines (talk) 07:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Democratic Left Party logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Democratic Left Party logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image Image:Ortakoey Istanbul Bosporusbruecke Mrz2005.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Ortakoey Istanbul Bosporusbruecke Mrz2005.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Ortakoey Istanbul Bosporusbruecke Mrz2005.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Ortakoey Istanbul Bosporusbruecke Mrz2005.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gokturk Flag

Okay, look. This is really starting to annoy me. The Gokturk flag has NO source whatsoever. There is that Turkish site, but as I can't read it, it is not useful. The only other site with that flag states: "To the best of our knowledge, the historical existence of most of these flags is not proven and we are not aware of their origin and designer." Therefore there are no sources as to that flag's existence, and I do not think it belongs on a FACTUAL encyclopaedia. Rcduggan (talk) 23:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you add two sources doesn't make it credible. The first is just a picture of a flag, which does not mean it was actually used. As is said of your first source on Flags of the World: "To the best of our knowledge, the historical existence of most of these flags is not proven..." so it is not definitive proof that the flag exists. The second site does not work, thus cannot be used to verify it. Furthermore you have reverted three times, which is against the rules of Wikipedia. Rcduggan (talk) 16:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:About flag of Göktürks

I realize that there are other sources. However, the only reason I am going after this flag is because there have been other flags from that site that were removed as unsourced as well. There were at least three more deleted. So I do not think this one should be any exception. Rcduggan (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos in Turkey

Hi! Thanks for your compliments about my photos. Unfortunately when I was in Istanbul, the weather was not very good and most of my photos were not as good as I hoped. It was very hazy and cloudy (and rainy) most of the time. I really enjoyed the country though and would love to go back another time soon. :-) Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 12:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Ecevit with dove.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ecevit with dove.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Россавиа ^Диалог 07:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC) --Россавиа ^Диалог 07:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Bulent Ecevit.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bulent Ecevit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Россавиа ^Диалог 07:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC) --Россавиа ^Диалог 07:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bulent Ecevit prime minister.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bulent Ecevit prime minister.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]