User talk:Dsasanayake

Speedy deletion of Malabsorption syndrom

A tag has been placed on Malabsorption syndrom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Abhishek ^{Talk |Contribs} 04:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Edits

Hi there. I'm afraid that I've reverted a number of your edits that have added blog links to science articles. While these blog articles appear OK, blogs are not generally considered reliable sources here (additionally, some of the blog links appear to be written by you, so may be interpreted as advertising). Furthermore, please don't change links to WP articles into links to blog sources. If we have an article on a topic, it's important that our in-article links point to it rather than some external source (regardless of the worthiness of that source). External links to reliable sources can be added in the appropriate section of an article instead. If you have any questions, let me know. Best regards, --PLUMBAGO 10:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Acupuncture has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Flewis^(talk) 09:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Themfromspace (talk) 10:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Cardiac marker, you will be blocked from editing. Themfromspace (talk) 08:52, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Themfromspace (talk) 00:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

W

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Graham87 06:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)