User talk:Dronkle/Archives/2011/March
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dronkle. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
AfD of article you worked on
Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justus Weiner (2nd nomination). Jaque Hammer (talk) 04:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I have Sir Thomas up for peer review with a view to getting the article up to FA standard. If you have time and are interested I should welcome any comments you may like to make on the PR page. No hurry on this. Regards. Tim riley (talk) 17:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry about this. A drive-by editor has thought fit to close the PR after less than 2 days and has, for some inexplicable reason, nominated the article for FA. I have naturally opposed the nomination as premature (some might also say discourteous, but let it pass) and will get the PR reinstated as soon as I can. Meanwhile, sorry you are being mucked about by this other editor. Tim riley (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)