User talk:Drolq
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Drolq! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Rim Tim Tagi Dim
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rim Tim Tagi Dim, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drolq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I admit that I used multiple accounts to evade the block on my first account. I understood my previous wrongdoings (lack of communication and overlinking) and made this account determined not to repeat them. Ever since I made this account, I put my effort into making well-sourced and constructive, not disruptive, edits that will be beneficial to Wikipedia's readers. I guarantee I will continue doing so, should I be unblocked.
Decline reason:
You've been so abusive that you are now considered banned by the community. No admin is free to unilaterally lift your block and there's no chance the community would consider lifting the block while you've continued to abusively evade your block. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply to the community to have your ban lifted under the terms of WP:SO. At that time, you should use the oldest account you still have access to. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Just noting that I've since had to implement two range blocks against this editor. -- ferret (talk) 14:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)