User talk:DriveMySol

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Tiramisoo (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Stop

Discuss the problem and wait for a consensus. If you continue to remove the content you will fast-track your way to another block-Regancy42 (talk) 10:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2010s. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 12:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox geographic region

Template:Infobox geographic region has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 14:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 in electro pop music

A tag has been placed on 2010 in electro pop music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. iBen^discuss 01:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010s in science and technology

The article 2010s in science and technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See WP:CRYSTAL. Wikipedia shouldn't predict the future.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gosox5555 (talk) 03:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

STOP - Generation pages

Please do not change the dates and introduction on the Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Z pages. Dates were reached through a consensus. --CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 04:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reconsider ! 04:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Names of the Decade

Please read the debate prior to adding or removing any new items. Artx (talk) 05:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2000s_(decade)#Request_for_consensus_concerning:_Names_of_the_decade

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to 2010s. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►quaestor─╢ 22:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pop culture history, 1920-present

Sorry, but this article is a real mess. Is there a good reason I shouldn't nominate it for deletion? You're not using reliable sources, and it has no proper focus or definition. Fences&Windows 23:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add non-free images, there's no fair use justification for such a general article. Fences&Windows 23:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on, I'm just starting the article. Don't abort it so fast. DriveMySol (talk) 23:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's unsalvagable. Please take a step back and look at what you're writing when you start articles. You're not basing them on sources, you're using whatever comes off the top of your head! Your enthusiasm is welcome, but you need to stop just throwing articles together. Fences&Windows 23:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010s in urban music

I have nominated 2010s in urban music, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010s in urban music. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fences&Windows 23:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2010s in music. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Don't repeat this while a deletion debate is open. Fences&Windows 00:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:SwampOregon.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:SwampOregon.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nymf _talk/contr. 12:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Generation Alpha

A tag has been placed on Generation Alpha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Pop culture history, 1920-present

I have nominated Pop culture history, 1920-present, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop culture history, 1920-present. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nymf _talk/contr. 14:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:LightsOwlman.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:LightsOwlman.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 07:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been banned for this behavior twice. Stop adding material even if it is true, unless a reliable source specifically says so. For instance in new wave article do not add material claiming the music is alive in the 2010's unless you can find a couple of sources that describe 2010s acts SPECIFICALLY as New Wave. This is different then having a minor New Wave influence. Edkollin (talk) 19:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split the 1990-2009 in fashion into two pages

You are not a fashion expert. If you were, then you'd know that the clothes in the 1990's had a completely different style from the 2000's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.108.192.9 (talk) 14:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Your contributed article, Mapping of the Earth

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Mapping of the Earth. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History of cartography. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of cartography - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — Timneu22 · talk 23:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:2012 millenarianism

Your contributed article, Fourth wave feminism

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Fourth wave feminism. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - feminism. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at feminism - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. tsunamishadow (talk) 16:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:2010Sinkhole.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2010Sinkhole.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:2010Sinkhole.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:2010Sinkhole.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2010Sinkhole.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2010Sinkhole.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010s again

My reason for deletion of the flying car entry is that http://jalopnik.com is almost certainly not a reliable source, and that I don't see definite evidence of adequate notability. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gerald Tennison

A tag has been placed on Gerald Tennison requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Empty Buffer (talk) 09:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gerald Tennison, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Empty Buffer (talk) 09:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Unfortunately, the site 2012news.com seems to be more of a blog than a reliable source. In addition, it seems to link to a video on YouTube that violates Fox News' copyright. For both reasons, we can't use it as a source for something on Wikipedia. I searched on Fox News for the original, but couldn't find it. Do you have another source that might conform with our policies? Yworo (talk) 23:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi, File:Gerald Tennison.jpg, File:Forest Cover, Ancient.jpg, File:Forest Cover, 2010.jpg, File:Subarctic.jpg, File:SwampOregon.JPG, File:Owlcity.JPG, and File:Lights portland.JPG are nominated for deletion for lacking licensing information. Could you add descriptions and the original dates when you took the images please? Regards Hekerui (talk) 08:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I see what you did there

A tag has been placed on I see what you did there requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GorillaWarfare ^talk 18:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Sarcasm

Category:Sarcasm, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 13:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Second Wave synthpop for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Second Wave synthpop, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Wave synthpop until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. N-HH talk/edits 17:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could also confirm whether you have any connection with the banned users Tiramisoo and OregonD000d. Thanks. N-HH talk/edits 17:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

^Hello.

I am an online friend of Mimzy, the person who used those accounts, yes, but I am not him. i am his partner in writing a book. DriveMySol (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm torn between assuming good faith and the evidence in front of my eyes. Either way, I can only advise you to stop following the behavioural patterns of those accounts, which seemed to involve mostly just making stuff up and using Wikipedia as some sort of glorified personal blog, where you create random essays masquerading as encyclopedia pages and shovel in your own random ideas and terminology about pop culture anywhere you can, mostly in articles about decades and synthpop. On that point, please also read this page. And take in what it says this time, assuming you've been directed to it before. N-HH talk/edits 13:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hide and Seek (Imogen Heap song), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Terrillja _talk 14:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating and adding incorrect categories to articles. There is a very specific definition of epic, Don't Stop Believing clearly does not fit that definition and Hide and Seek clearly has piano accompaniment at around 3:30 into it. The bulk of the song is a capella, but the song is not a capella in its entirely.--Terrillja _talk 15:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Artifical sight

Hello DriveMySol, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on November 3 2010, Artifical sight, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Terrillja (note: page has no mainspace links, and 2 edits). This has been done because the page is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Terrillja. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Terrillja (talk · contribs) 06:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:7Civilizations.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:7Civilizations.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

I've removed most of your edits of the past 12 hours. Specific items I've tags for deletion are:

ECETI Institute (not notable)
Category:Modern civilizations (no possible criteria for inclusion)

and I'm not sure about

Category:2010 in California and Category:2010 in Texas, although I've included the categories properly in our category hierarchy. However, I don't think 2010 World Series belongs in either category.

I haven't reverted your film genre category additions, although I'm very tempted to bring it up in Wikipedia:WikiProject Film, as you've been reverted before. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I am following you...your edits to categories were almost always wrong when I last ran into you, but I probably wouldn't have noticed you utill you made the absurd edits on musical style in 2010s. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't edit my User:Arthur Rubin; please leave comments in the appropriate User talk:Arthur Rubin. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Devv.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Devv.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Terrillja _talk 22:13, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010s in fashion

A tag has been placed on 2010s in fashion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is too soon to merit an article devoted to the decade as a whole, and it may come into conflict with Wikipedia's policy against crystal ball. This article's contents should be blanked, but the page locked and reserved however until 2015 or 2016 when the fashion of which becomes truly present and seen in retrospect.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.

Nomination of ECETI Institute for deletion

The article ECETI Institute is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECETI Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jps (talk) 16:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:7Civilizations.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:7Civilizations.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:7Civilizations.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:7Civilizations.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Existentialist films

Category:Existentialist films, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 03:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:2000s metal groups

Category:2000s metal groups, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:2012 theorists

Category:2012 theorists, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheListening.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheListening.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010s in electropop music

The article 2010s in electropop music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, little coverage in independent, reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adabow (talk) 20:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2010s in music for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010s in music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010s in music (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBZFan30 (talk) 22:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Dirty pop" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dirty pop. Since you had some involvement with the Dirty pop redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]