User talk:DrippingGoofball
Hey DrippingGoofball, welcome to wikipedia and all that. I've been watching the Bilal Abdullah, and have noticed that you aren't using the "Edit Summary" box. This greatly helps other editors in knowing what is being changed in the article. Cheers! Murderbike 00:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Mea Culpa, I've been lazy... OK, will do! Thanks for the welcome. DrippingGoofball 00:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Page moves
[edit]Hi - I reverted your last change at Khalid Ahmed. If you want to move a page, please use the move button at the top. For more information, see WP:MOVE. If you have any questions, just drop a note on my talk page. Thanks! -SCEhardT 17:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- At the Khalid Ahmed page, click the 'move' button at the top. On the move page, change the 'To new title:' field to the correct name. In the 'Reason:' field, put a quick note such as "correcting name". Then click the 'Move page' button and the page will be moved. Let me know if you have any trouble :-) -SCEhardT 17:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use
[edit]Because they would be copyrighted, they would be uploaded locally here on Wikipedia, rather than to Commons (Wikimedia Commons, which only accepts free content). There would probably be some biographies of living persons concerns, seeing as none have yet been convicted of the charges in a trial, although they have been plastered over most newspapers so that might be less of an issue. Any fair use image has to fulfil all of the fair use criteria, and must be accompanied by a fair use rationale. Read more about fair use here, if you're not sick of it already ;). Its pretty complex, to say the least. Feel free to ask me any other questions you might have. RHB - Talk 11:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
The image does not identify the copyright holder, nor does it have a fair use rationale. ShadowHalo 19:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
He says the text just dissappears when he opens the "edit this page" but I have never heard of this happening to any other user so this could just be an excuse for vandalism but you can never be sure. It might be worth while checking if this has happened to someone else but chances are this person is just here to vandalise and they came up with this excuse. If it is found that no-one else has had this problem it might be best to block this person from editing. AngelOfSadness 14:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Seeing as he tried to add/edit information about the UK, maybe get some sort of block for him as how can anyone possibly add more infomation about it. I mean that all the information that can be said about it is there or there's links to the information. Also I've noticed that anyone who is editing an article about any country just simply blanks it for some strange reason so a block might have to be inforced. AngelOfSadness 15:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I can report the user for you if you like as I'm used to reporting vandals as I'm on recent changes patrol. It's very simple if you have twinkle installed for your wikipedia profile. AngelOfSadness 15:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I had reported it earlier but since User talk:81.109.227.62 wasn't editing at the time, someone deleted it as the report was "stale". We have to wait until User talk:81.109.227.62 is editing then we can report them, but we can't we they are off-line. The page to report vandals currently editing is:Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. If you install WP:TW it is much faster giving warnings and reporting vandals. The page tells you what to do on how to install it. AngelOfSadness 16:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I can report the user for you if you like as I'm used to reporting vandals as I'm on recent changes patrol. It's very simple if you have twinkle installed for your wikipedia profile. AngelOfSadness 15:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick note about the 3O system. I noticed that you responded to a request for review from Mdd4696 regarding his edits to Lisa Donovan. Thanks very much for contributing. Please make sure, though, that you remove the entry from the list (noting which entry is being removed and how many remain) when you make the response. In this instance, I would have removed the entry and recommended to the editor in question that he make use of RFF, since 3O is only to be used as a dispute resolution process rather than a review/feedback process. Thanks again for your contribution. Adrian M. H. 20:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
User Page
[edit]Your userpage is:
{{broken|Mozilla Firefox}}
--User:Krator (t c) 23:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi - I don't know if you've had a chance to look at the changes I've made to this page, but I'd welcome some feedback, as this is my first time offering a third opinion. For example, I don't know if you were expecting me to actually make changes or just offer suggestions. Also, should I have come up with a compromise as I did, or just arbitrate and say "A is right and B is wrong". As I said on the article's talk page, you'll probably disagree with some of the changes I made, but I'd be interested in hearing your opinions all the same. – Tivedshambo (talk) 07:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Removing the link to Arts and Crafts site
[edit]Hi,
I do not understand your reasons for removing the link to artcraftsite.com/glass/soldering-stained-glass.shtml
The heading of the Wikipedia page says:
Lead came and Copper foil glasswork are the arts and crafts of cutting colored glass and joining the pieces into picturesque designs.
the page i am linking to is an arts and crafts page that contains a step-by-step tutorial on how to us copper foil in order to join pieces of colored glass. It is a valuable, unique resource.
It fits the topic of the page perfectly and yet you insist on removing the link...
Why ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.139.104.8 (talk) 21:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I see you are a user located in Montréal, you may be interested in: Wikipedia:Meetup/Montreal. Please add your name to the "Interested" or to the "Not interested" list. Time and place haven't been decided yet. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 17:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello DrippingGoofball! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 12 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Réal Giguère - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Science Lab
[edit]Why are you changing all the references to Science Lab? In what sense is it a fraud? Just wondering. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- I can give you half a dozen references suggesting that this company commits systematic fraud, if you are interested. Out of respect for the wiki, I'm slaving over finding replacement entries. I just spoke to a local journalist who called up the TX attorney general's office, and although their lips are sealed, they could say that they have 12 pending fraud complaints with similar profiles. The BBB has over 80 unanswered complaints. The modus operandi seems consistent, they charge the client right away, and they either don't ship anything, ship items scavenged from old labs, or make a partial shipment and never refund the difference. I forget that trick to sign with date... sorry! [[[DrippingGoofball]]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrippingGoofball (talk • contribs) 17:59, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- DrippingGoofball: I have moved your reply to my enquiry to your own talk page. Now, I have poked about and I can understand your concerns regarding Science Lab. I am not sure that such concerns necessarily affect their verascity as a source of information and you must be careful with regard to your edit summaries that you are not committing a libel. By-the-way, the signing thing is done with four tilds thus: ~~~~. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 18:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, I understand your concerns with this company, but do you think your edit summaries could have violated the Wikipedia:Libel policy? Postoak (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tim Song (talk) 19:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC){{unblock|My goal is to remove links to sciencelab.com whose reported customer problems suggest systematic fraud. I can provide supporting evidece. I have been replacing these links to those of various companies with whom I have no ties of any kind. I have reason to believe that their MSDS may not be up to standard, especially with nomenclature. Thank you for taking the time to reconsider.}}
- I've asked the blocking admin to revisit this block.[1] While we're waiting perhaps you could think of a better edit summary. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well. That was entertaining. No good deed goes unsmitten, but there was a benefit to this cluster of chaos: I found some interesting pages to add to my watchlist. Happy to see it turning out for the better. Best regards, __ Just plain Bill (talk) 22:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
You're invited!
[edit]Hello, DrippingGoofball,
You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.
The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!
(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]Hi DrippingGoofball!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 01:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi DrippingGoofball! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
[edit]| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi DrippingGoofball! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon
[edit]| Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
| Hi DrippingGoofball! The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Montreal! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join! Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. | |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Request for opinion
[edit]Hi DrippingGoofball: Sorry to trouble you, but I could not help but notice your expression of affection for TOS on the Wikipedians who like Star Trek: The Original Series page, and so I would be curious of your thoughts on the notability of a Star Trek author for whom I just created a Wikipedia article -- which may be promptly destined for the trash pile. As a newcomer here at Wikipedia, my first article attempt was indeed recommended for deletion within hours of its creation by a senior user named JzG who seems to me to be overly hostile and dismissive of Star Trek, calling it fancruft (= trivial, obscure, of importance to just a tiny group of fanatics) . Since you are a Trek fan, if it is also your good faith opinion that my subject is in no way deserving of an article on this site; and you could let me know, I would feel much more comfortable with the justice of the pending deletion action. My proposed article may be seen here, assuming you visit the page soon enough ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Gurian Kind Regards. Tosresearcher (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, DrippingGoofball. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)