User talk:Dreylax01

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Dreylax01, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Mat ty.007 19:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A2 milk requested move

Hi there, any reason why you inserted this thread deep within the talk page and not at the bottom per Help:Using talk pages? I suspect the discussion will be missed by editors who may have an opinion to offer. BlackCab (TALK) 13:30, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say exactly the same thing as BlackCab. -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 15:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As above, with the addition that if there isn't a particularly good reason, I'm going to boldly remove it to avoid confusion. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:14, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake - I meant to add to the bottom. I was perplexed why a science page is referring to a brand so heavily as they are completely different issues. I think this should be discussed. I was also wondering why the founders don't have pages about them, as I think its a very interesting subject. Thoughts?Dreylax01 (talk) 13:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The entity we know as "A2 milk" exists only because it is a commercialised product marketed on the basis that it is free of A1 beta-casein proteins. Apart from that product, there is no A2 milk. There was a brief discussion about your proposal here and the consensus was to leave the A2 milk article as is. When you say "they are separate issues", what do you mean? What are the separate issues and how would you propose Wikipedia articles on them? There is nothing preventing articles on the founders of the company: as long as they meet Wikipedia criteria for notability, anyone is free to start writing them. Feel free! BlackCab (TALK) 08:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Corran Mclachlan (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr Corran Mclachlan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^speak up! 04:33, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corran McLachlan has been accepted

Corran McLachlan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]