User talk:DrexMafia

Welcome!

Hello, DrexMafia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Secret Princess, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --ElHef (Meep?) 21:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Secret Princess

The article The Secret Princess has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Future film which fails WP:NF - cited sources are IMDB and a blog.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --ElHef (Meep?) 21:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Secret Princess

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Secret Princess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/76011566/the-secret-princess/?ref=kicktraq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Secret Princess for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Secret Princess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret Princess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --ElHef (Meep?) 19:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hello, DrexMafia. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of TransTales Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TransTales Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TransTales Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to The Secret Princess, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Recreating The Secret Princess

Please stop recreating The Secret Princess. You have not provided any additional sources or addressed the concerns that were brought up at the AFD discussion. Recreating the same article in contravention of the consensus that was reached in that discussion is considered disruptive editing. If you continue to do so, it will be reported as such. --ElHef (Meep?) 01:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

• I've deleted the article history because DrexMafia kept trying to re-add the information to Wikipedia. This will hopefully deter any further efforts at trying to re-create the article. Please Drex- stop trying to re-add this information. The consensus was that the movie is not notable. Odds are very high that TransTales will close as delete as well. We cannot and will not keep information just because it's useful or it would be nice to keep it. You must show notability via reliable sources- which are lacking in both instances. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm CogitoErgoSum14. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to The Secret Princess, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (talk) 02:12, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Secret Princess with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Erebus Morgaine ^(Talk) 02:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheSecretPrincess.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheSecretPrincess.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop

I'm asking that you please stop re-adding pages and trying to remove AfD templates from Wikipedia. The movie was deleted via an AfD discussion. It doesn't pass our notability guidelines. As nice as it'd be to be able to have an article for the film on Wikipedia, the movie just isn't notable at this point in time. It might never be notable. Most indie films fly under the radar and never gain coverage. I wish that your film did have the coverage since it sounds like fun, but it doesn't. Re-creating the article is considered to be disruptive. Removing the AfD template is also considered to be disruptive and will not stop the AfD from progressing. If the article to TTE is deleted, please do not recreate it. It will only get deleted again and this will likely end with you getting blocked from editing permanently. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

It is not notable enough?

Because you live in a small village in Canada does not mean you know what is notable to everyone Certainly Justin Bieber new T Shirt colour is what Wikipedia is for, right?

Stop with your perspective, the world is a bit bigger than you think

Wikipedia has clear policies regarding notability. You have not yet demonstrated the film's notability in accordance with those policies. No subjective judgments were made. If you disagree with the decision that was made, please comment on the merits of your argument. Attacking other editors is not going to help your case one bit. See WP:NPA. --ElHef (Meep?) 21:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing, promotional editing and continually recreating deleted content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Pleas yourself. I contributed but some of you now own wiki so do what you want. good luck

SPI

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DrexMafia. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)