User talk:Drewax11

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scioto River, you may be blocked from editing. postdlf (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saudia Flight 163

There are discussions taking place here[1] and here[2] concerning my reversions of edits you made to this article. Please join in the conversation....William 19:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Drewax11. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation.
Message added 22:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

...William 22:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Charlotte Douglas International Airport has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Charlotte Douglas International Airport was changed by Drewax11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891136 on 2014-01-05T13:59:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LIAT

You claimed that the "sources" were not operational, yet only one of the three references in that section is dead. So wholesale blanking of that section is completely inappropriate and careless on your behalf. Further, Caribbean-region media commonly has story after story about service problems and customer complaints regarding LIAT. So much, if not all, of the information in that section is verifiable, and so blanking is improper on that basis as well. See policy at WP:PRESERVE. postdlf (talk) 14:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you said in the regard to the edits I made on the LIAT pages were false. One source was dead while the other said nothing about the staff, baggage, departing without passengers, and baggage. Obviously this section cannot stay because it's obvious the claims are from someone's experiences and not from a source. Drewax11 (talk) 14:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewax11 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from my talk page; keep this together in one thread, as I have your talk page watchlisted.You're still not doing this carefully. You removed all mention of the 2010 strike and the relevant Antigua Observer reference (your comment above suggests you didn't even notice there were three sources in the paragraph). The nicknames you removed are expressly mentioned in the HuffPost link. What else do you think you missed? And you've ignored what I said about WP:PRESERVE and what is verifiable. In any event, do you at least finally agree that completely removing the entire section was not the proper way to handle the one dead link? postdlf (talk) 17:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The nicknames are also supported by CNN ("Disgruntled customers regularly say LIAT stands for Languishing In Airport Terminals, Luggage In Another Terminal or Leaving Island Any Time."). And as I said above, you need to look at regional media, which apparently you haven't bothered to research.[3] ("LIAT has been under pressure in recent times following weeks of long and inordinate delays as well as cancellations..."); [4]; [5] ("LIAT...has come under severe criticism from the travelling public."); [6] postdlf (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not relevant. No other airline page says anything about nicknames by passengers. All airlines lose bags, have mean flight attendants, have delays etc. But if you just put conjecture that they frequently lose bags, cancel flights with people not on them, then you need numbers. What percentage of flights are delayed, how many "surly" flight attendants are there. You have no numbers to show anything and it's not relevant. If there was a customer satisfaction survey that would be great, but that's not what you cited.Drewax11 (talk) 23:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Also it mentions the troubles of 2013 in the incidents and accidents section. Drewax11 (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eurotunnel Shuttle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

at the back, and both must be manned so that the train can be reversed out in case of a blockage. (Each locomotive is capable of hauling the train on its own in the event that its partner fails. In

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Pepper. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Glenn Grothman— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. "Pepper" @ 03:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]