User talk:Dreamspy

This is Dreamspy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hi Why do you want to delete this article, famous Scholar. Was even member of Hoover Foundation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.203.227.6 (talk) 12:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

		My RFA
		Thank you muchly for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth! Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome!

First of all, I must commend you on the blurb you left on your userpage about being new and asking for help. That shows commitment and openness to input from other users. I have a feeling that you'll like it here and that you'll do well. You have already made a few good edits and I see you're being pretty active in the AfD discussions and that you have an understanding of the major Wikipedia policies. Well done so far!
There was one thing that I wanted to suggest about a recent redirect you made on Noah lemas. Good job on redirecting the article to the proper spelling of the name. When an article is being considered for deletion, it's probably best to not create a redirect (even if it's misspelled) until the debate is concluded. In the case that the debate is closed with the result of Delete, all of the redirects to the article have to be deleted separately so it's best to not have any until such a time that we decide to keep it. Still, good job in redirecting it.
By the way, I replaced the introductory note you wrote at the top of this page with a standard talk page header box that is more informative and maybe a little better looking so I was hoping you'd like it. If you don't like it, feel free to delete it and add your own text back.
If you need any help getting settled in, feel free to ask me for help.
Peace! SWik78 (talk) 14:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I rather rudely deleted a red link from your talk page before I realised it was your talk page. Sorry! I meant to thank you for your contribution to the article on John Edmunds. Do you have a source for your addition? Jack1956 (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppetry

No i am not (Silverhorse (talk) 08:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/WarthogDemon

I indented your second comment[1][2] as a double vote. Dorftrottel (talk) 17:22, March 26, 2008

You're very welcome. As a side note, Wikipedia lingo would call the above a heads-up rather than a warning, the latter usually resulting only from a blockable offense. Dorftrottel (vandalise) 07:39, March 27, 2008

RfA Thanks

A message from WarthogDemon.

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, was unsuccessful with 61 support, 25 oppose, and 4 neutral. I've been taking the advice of the Opposes into practice and hopefully I can improve myself. Once again, thank you. ^_^

Afd on Alonso R. del Portillo

Which articles can not be verified? Have you read Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith? Callelinea (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are all verifiable. They are in published books. Books are considered #1 for verifiability. Callelinea (talk) 22:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is where "Good Faith" comes in. So you are saying that all book references should be thrown out and only those that have an internet link are any good? Not all notable persons have something on the internet. Notable is not the same as famous. I understand your a "newbie" and that is why I am trying to clear this up with you.Callelinea (talk) 22:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know any book mentioned in Wikipedia is accurate? You either go to the library and read it or you go back to Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith. Callelinea (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one proof of what I am saying is true Amazon.Com where I am mentioned in Pedro and Me. Callelinea (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessments

Hi. In checking on recent assessment changes through WP:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, I noted that you had changed assessment ratings on the Jonathan Frakes article, both on class and priority parameters. These assessments are usually done by members of the given project and have specific criteria for the levels. In the case of Frakes, his priority level is in the mid to high range, "Actors and filmmakers who are well-known in the film industry, to film buffs, and others" if for no other reason than his involvement with Star Trek. The class of the article really isn't at a B level as of yet. It still is fairly brief in discussion of his career, isn't well laid out yet, and is missing considerable referencing, especially in the career section. I just wanted to let you know the reasons the assessment has been changed, and how the process generally works. Thanks! Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The assessments for quality can sometimes be a bit subjective, but experience tends to guide one to be more objective with it. One of the things I looked at was the quality of the content, which is kind of stark in comparison to a lot of B articles. The big problems to me were with the layout (the entire personal life stuck at the beginning of the article isn't in the way that is mostly accepted as standard for a biography, although it's not a policy), the relatively brief and stark outlining of his acting/directing roles, and how it just stopped. I looked at the mini-biography on IMDB, which can't really be used as a reliable source, but it certainly has a lot more detail, which could be a jumping off point for a well-detailed article. I am sure the sources are out there. In the quality guidelines, for a start class article, it says Some readers will find what they are looking for, but many will not. A reader genuinely interested in the topic is likely to seek additional information elsewhere. On the other hand, for a B class article Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic. It just doesn't have the content. If it were an article in which I wasn't very familiar with the subject, I might accept it as a B class, but probably, due to the layout and really sparse referencing, maybe not. In any case, if you have questions, be sure to ask. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 13:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Moorcroft

It's gone now. Thanks! - Philippe 16:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Film AfD

Hi, I noticed your other comments on AfD disccusions for film. Would you mind having a look at this one: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraught? Thank you! Dgf32 (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Madden (solicitor)

I don't know if I should have done it, but I removed the AfD from the article and put a CSD tag on it. The second nomination AfD was never on the main AfD page.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

An article you have an interest in, Jonathan Bishop, has been nominated for deletion. You might wish to express your opinion on the proposed deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Bishop_(3rd_nomination). Pontyboy (talk) 10:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Thompson

Sorry, but it's not a vanity article. I'm not sure how familiar you are with the subject, but the band she was in was big back in 2001-2004. Please read my comment at the AFD and consider changing your vote to a merge or redirect. - Mgm|^(talk) 21:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cassius Marcellus Clay, Sr.

Do you have an opinion on the expanded version of Cassius Marcellus Clay, Sr.? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 13:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paige Moss

I do understand your comment at the AFD was likely based upon THIS sorry stub with no decently sourced assertion of notability, but I ask that you revisit the article Paige Moss as it is now being expanded and the BLP being properly sourced to show meeting WP:ENT. Thanks, --Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Selina Dolaro

Hi. You added information about her marriage, but you did not give citations to your sources. Please add the citations. See WP:RS. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Érin Geraghty

Wikipedia doesn't automatically delete articles at the request of the subject. It can happen but only after a discussion at articles for deletion. If you want to nominate the article for deletion for that reason you should use that process. Hut 8.5 21:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dreamspy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dreamspy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Dreamspy, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Everedux (talk) 20:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

How long?

You say "Oppose infobox - article has managed this long without one", - I am curious: how long was that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Russell Hulme

Hi. You added "one of three children of Albert Lumley Lewis Hulme (1919–2009)". What source is this from? I've removed this from the article until we can cite a source. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPPRIMARY

Never support a date of birth with WP:BLPPRIMARY. Toddst1 (talk) 16:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V again

Thanks for adding the factoid to Doris, but it would be extremely helpful if you would please cite your source(s) when you add a fact to Wikipedia, or change a factual assertion. Please see WP:V for more information about sourcing. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kitty Loftus

On 15 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kitty Loftus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that musical theatre actress Kitty Loftus was praised as "a tricky sprite and a fantastic elf"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kitty Loftus. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kitty Loftus), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Walter H. Fisher

Do you have a source for this change that you made? Would you kindly cite it? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_H._Fisher&type=revision&diff=966915242&oldid=952315760 Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 10:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries, please

Please supply edit summaries for your changes, so others working on the article know why you are making the change. Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Lyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October harvest

treats --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeremy Nicholas (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Robinson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Your edit to James Walter Fairholme has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Rolf Saxon. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hilda Hanbury

German Wikipedia is not a source.Xx236 (talk) 12:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilda_Louise_Hanbury in the text.Xx236 (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Laurier

Hi there! I’m building a family tree and wanted to know how you found out about my great great grandfather? Really accurate information that matches up. I see you also mention you have an interest in the military? My great grandfather, Leslie James Alexander was a Lieutenant I believe would be great to know where you’re getting these records. :) Jordyn Laurier (talk) 09:47, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pennyplunderer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pennyplunderer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]