User talk:Dreamfnder

Welcome!

Hello, Dreamfnder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sci-Fried, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Fly by Night (talk) 23:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sci-Fried

Thanks for your contribution. We welcome contributions from all editors. However, as an encyclopaedia, we have certain standards that need to be met. I have added some tags to the article to highlight improvements that need to be made. If you need any help then feel free to ask me, to post on the help desk or to leave a message on the article's talk page. — Fly by Night (talk) 23:51, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sci-Fried

A tag has been placed on Sci-Fried, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 00:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deletion

A music article must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. The Orlando Weekly is a suitable reference, but really only indicates some coverage in a small part of one US state, and at some conventions. I don't think that the other, web-only, sources are reliable independent sources.

The three albums don't seem to be notable, and there is no indication that the band is signed to a label. Sharing the stage with notable groups doesn't transfer their notability. It's a bit spammy in places, although I've seen worse rapid-fire delivery and ingenuity add the perfect spice... bringing authority to the creativity... His unique guitar sounds and solos... technical excellence etc.

It would help if you put your references in-line, and formatted them to be easier to read, eg [url description] instead of just url. So you get Orlando Weekly instead of http://orlandoweekly.com/boo/arts-entertainment/music-readers-picks-1.1174942

I'm not unsympathetic, but you need better evidence of notability, and a bit more work on the text Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:19, 20 September 2011 (UTC) \[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can someone review the article on my user page and tell me if it would be marked for quick deletion?

Essentially, we have a local band, recognized by local press. The band fails to meet either the general notability guidelines or the topical notability guidelines for bands. At the very least, you need to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Anything less may result in deletion. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 03:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've formatted your references and ELs. The article is better, but basically its little known unsigned musicians making unknown albums in a corner of Florida. I think that unless you can find a bit more national coverage, like the Wired review, even if I don't redelete there is a good chance someone else will. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, try it and see. I wont delete if you repost, but that doesn't mean no one else will. There are a number of band articles that strictly speaking don't meet the notability criteria, but are referenced and look OK, so yours has as good a chance as the others Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]