User talk:Drbillellis

Welcome!

Hello, Drbillellis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Arcadian 19:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VX - don't be shy

You're quite right that the statement "the VX is in the process of being diluted into VX hydrolysate" in the VX (nerve agent) doesn't adequately explain that step in the process of VX destruction. If you should see anything like that that needs changing, please don't be shy: fix it! :) – Clockwork Soul 21:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your first main space contribution! Thanks for helping out. Although Wikipedia has a vast number of articles, a large majority of them require still some degree of work before they meet a high standard of quality. I hope that you decide to stick around and help out a bit more: we can use another competent editor! Cheers! – Clockwork Soul 01:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PAHs and PNAs

Please see the talk page for the PAH article. I'm curious about the usage of the term PNAs, and its definition. Cheers, Esox id^{talk•contribs} 21:28, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for Structural Components of the Universe

First of all, I would like to say thank you for consulting me regarding this. This is my comment:

As far as you are concerned, another similar but more comprehensive article is already present, which is Earth's location in the universe. This is a substantially far more better and more amazing article. So I think there is no more need to create another one. Second, the title itself is very complex, it is not the first thing that will come to a person's mind. Plus, if you say "Structural components of the universe", it tells the specific objects of what the structures of the universe consist of (ex. Galaxies, Dark matter, Stars, etc.), which I think goes to List of astronomical objects.

You suggested a good article, but I think it is no more needed, so it may be deleted. However, it is in good faith, and you've done a great job; the only thing is you didn't research carefully. Bear in mind that when you've created an article make sure it contains info independent of other articles. Try making some research first. All of the articles I've created first are done in careful searches.

Don't worry about that. You can create even more better articles. As for now, I will nominate it for deletion. But continue to contribute to the Wikiproject! I can see you will be a big help. SkyFlubbler (talk) 10:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I already fixed that together with a few guys from the Wikiproject Astronomical Objects. Here is the explaination:

I've read R.B Tully's paper, which states the following: The system used to map the Virgo SC was redshift determination, while that of Laniakea is Wieman filtering. Laniakea is actually the combination of Virgo, Hydra-Centaurus, and Pavo-Indus superclusters. Since the claim was less than two weeks ago, in the middle of the hot pursuit I also asked the same question, and gave me the answer as this: 1970 papers use the term "Local Supercluster" to Virgo SC until Laniakea's discovery. Also, one must note that the Virgo SC is a lobe part of Laniakea. This "lobe" still has not any classification, it may be a pre-supercluster or something. We will wait until Tully's next paper regarding this. For now, Virgo SC is still redundant. SkyFlubbler (talk) 12:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chaussee

Hi Bill, just seen your comment on this article. To add a reference just enclose the words in <ref> and </ref>. Hope that helps. Cheers. Bermicourt (talk) 06:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

The sandbox exists for experimentation with Wikipedia 'markup' etc. It shoud not be submitted for review unless it contains a fully-fledged draft that is considered ready for mainspace. If you require assistance please go to the help desk or the teahouse or you can place {{help me}} and then your question at your talk page and someone will answer the query. FWIW the images seemed to work when I tried them at Jacksons. Please bear in mind WP:NOTGALLERY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Drbillellis/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Drbillellis/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Drbillellis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi the reason the images on Jacksons of Piccadilly failed is because you had changed "tea" to "Tea" and filenames are case-sensitive. Also in future for sure questions ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Wikipedia:Help desk. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Drbillellis/sandbox

Hello, Drbillellis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]