User talk:DrarSoaad/sandbox

I appreciate that you explained the procedure of MS2 tagging in better detail. I would suggest separating the advantages and disadvantages into two different sections. This way the readers can better absorb the information and it looks even more organized.Ewells2013 (talk) 18:43, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

First of all, I liked that the writer mentions the recent results of this technique, also she explains the caveat of the process. In addition, I found that all references are reliable sources. But I have some comments in the Advantages and disadvantages section. In this section, I only read about the cons of the technique. I suggest writing some points about the pros. In addition, there are some grammar mistakes such as One of the caveats. i hope that my comments help to improve the article.Albahrani Batool (talk) 22:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.205.13.37 (talk) [reply]

The edits are pretty good, besides a few grammatical changes. I would recommend some newer sources; some articles citing your sources are from 2017 and still provide the same info, just newer. Your second use of Reference 7 is nearly plagiarized. I would also agree to distinguish the few advantages you mention. Otherwise, the article is much more helpful now. Mbarnett2014 (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]