User talk:Drakehellman
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Drakehellman has not edited Wikipedia since 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome!
Hello, Drakehellman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Powers T 18:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Minor Pirates of the Caribbean characters
[edit]You've been doing the right thing, good work. That's what we're here for. Good show. Dac 22:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- That sort of thing is more or less out of my hands. I know there's a distinct lack of information but it's both sourced and relevant so I don't see much of a problem with it. Dac 22:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, minor characters with no citations can go. Good show. Dac 23:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: Organization XIII
[edit]Sure, I think you just have to request it somewhere. Not sure where though. Just search for something like "Semi-protection" and it'll probably tell you what to do. The Splendiferous Gegiford 13:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Will Turner
[edit]I haven't gone via the Will Turner page in a long time, it isn't on my watchlist. However, if they're saying that, then yes, definitely add a protect. Dac 22:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Simple reverting maybe, but if it's repeated reverting of the same thing, there's grounds to have it protected. Dac 22:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
James Norrington Toys
[edit]I am more than willing to allow it, albeit perhaps more condensed, in the toys section, yes. However, toys are not, nor have they ever, been canon for a movie series, as I'm sure you're aware. Thanks, man. Dac 11:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- No, I am entirely satisfied with how you've worked it in. More so, in fact, since you also appear to have removed some uncertain wording from it as well. I appreciate it, my friend. Good job. And feel free to take the initiative on matters such as this in future, you're more than welcome to. Dac 11:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants April 2007 Newsletter
[edit]| WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants Newsletter | |||
| April 2007 | Volume 1, Issue 8 |
|
|
|
Black Pearl
[edit]I believe that this was because the trailer portrayed the Pearl exchanging fire with the Dutchman in the whirlpool; it is apparently recognisable as the Pearl. Dac 08:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Beckett
[edit]Oh well. My mistake. I guess I was wrong about Beckett, but he is the main antogonist. -LooneyGeoffrey
WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants May 2007 Newsletter
[edit]| WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants Newsletter | |||
| May 2007 | Volume 1, Issue 9 |
|
|
|
Hello, Drakehellman. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Lucky.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Drakehellman/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 19:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
-2007-05-16T19:14:00.000Z-Image:Lucky.JPG){kind=link}
Barbossa in AWE videogame
[edit]I've seen and played as Barbossa in the PC version. You can play as him in Singapore and while rescuring Jack from Davy Jones' Locker. A friend of mine bought Wii version and he also confirmed that he played as Barbossa.
Apparently, there are two versions of the game: one for XBox 360 and PS3, and other for PS2/PC/Wii. So, Barbossa is definitely in the latter one.
Spoiler tag in Jack Sparrow article
[edit]I believe that the summaries will have to be rewritten if we are not to add spoiler tags. The truth of the Jack Sparrow article is that there are spoilers in it because it mainly summarizes the movie, not the actions of Jack himself. Therefore it requires a spoiler tag. I will attempt to re-write it without spoilers. Therefore the tag will not be needed. Happy Editing! --MajinVegeta 06:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Captain Hector Barbossa
[edit]In all examples of people with the prefix captain in Wikipedia (including, quite pertinently, Captain Jack Sparrow) we have the prefix captain followed by the name of the article subject. There is simply no point in having "Hector Barbossa better known as Captain Barbossa". It is a cumbersome way of wording the whole sentence. It is surely much better just to name him as Captain Hector Barbossa as I have done? Comments? Benbristol 00.28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies. My bad. It seems as if captain is generally left out of article titles. However, I still think the sentence is cumbersome. It may be advisable to remove mention of him being Captain Barbossa and just state that Hector Barbossa is a former captain of the Black Pearl? I don't know. Benbristol 00.31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
SpongeBob
[edit]Creator Stephen Hillenburg Wants SpongeBob SquarePants To Remain Ageless So Stop Putting That 1986 Birthdate On SpongeBob Biography
PS Leave The July 14th Birthdate Alone And Don't Put The 1986
- No, it's already been discussed in the SpongeBob SquarePants group area. So stop taking it out. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 01:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Creator Stephen Hillenburg has always said that he wanted SpongeBob to remain ageless
Hillenburg stated later in an interview that it was only in a dream and cannot be confirmed
- Regardless on that info, it is to remain in there, as it has already been discussed, and removing it will result in vandalism. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 03:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
SpongeBob's Age Was Never Mentioned On The Show At All
- It was shown on the episode Sleepy Time. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 03:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Like I said before Hillenburg stated later in an interview that it was only in a dream and cannot be confirmed.
- So what? It is information on SpongeBob regardless, and, like I said before, it's already been disucssed and is to remain in the regardless. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 03:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
SpongeBob
[edit]I Read Somewere That SponegeBob Was Born July 14th 1980
- It'll be better to bring that up on the talk page so that others may discuss it. But so far, It's being kept at 1986, however, you are still free to discuss it. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 06:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
SpongeBob Wasn't Born In 1986 OK
- And how do you know that? Besides, don't complain to me, bring it up on the talk page. And please, sign your posts too. Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 22:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Because SpongeBob's Age Was Never Said And The Creator Want SpongeBob To Remain Ageless
- Sigh* Will you please stop whinning to me and bring up the matter on the talk page so that other may discuss it as well? Captain Drake Van Hellsing Savvy? 01:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants June 2007 Newsletter
[edit]| WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants Newsletter | |||
| June 2007 | Volume 1, Issue 10 |
|
|
|
Orphaned non-free image (Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Fair use disputed for Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:MeetTheRobinsons BowlerHatGuy.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boingo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Boingo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
|
This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us. |
Taifarious1 09:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Boingo (Hoodwinked)
[edit]
I have nominated Boingo (Hoodwinked), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boingo (Hoodwinked). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 01:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Pirates wikia
[edit]You are a big PotC fan, so why don't you come to our wikia, we are searching for more members as ther's much to add/improve in our wikia. Pirates of the Caribbean Wiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.62.76.15 (talk) 07:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Spykidsfloopalanub0-1-.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Spykidsfloopalanub0-1-.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
RFC notification
[edit]Due to your editorial involvement in {{101_Dalmatians}} I thought you might want to participate in the RFC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#RFC: Overhauling the Disney franchise templates for consistency.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay
[edit]
Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.
Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.
Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)