User talk:OzzyWolvie

Marco Dulca

Salut, esti sigur ca nu a fost imprumutat in primul an la Chindia? Eu imi aduc aminte clar ca s-a scris ca a fost dat la schimb in vara asta pentru ca Aioani sa ajunga la Farul. Am gasit si surse in care scrie ca e imprumutat: [www.digisport.ro/amphtml/fotbal/liga-1/ce-simte-un-fotbalist-inlocuit-in-primele-minute-marco-dulca-a-raspuns-imediat-si-a-oferit-un-exemplu-1006405] [1].

Si iata chiar si site-ul oficial al Farului: [2] Te rog sa fii mai atent de acum inainte fiindca e a doua oara cand vad pagina editata asa.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 12:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dragos411, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dragos411! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Amir Jorza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rareș Ilie

The article Rareș Ilie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roberto Mălăele

The article Roberto Mălăele has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ștefan Pănoiu

The article Ștefan Pănoiu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enrichi Finica for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enrichi Finica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrichi Finica until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rareș Ilie

The article Rareș Ilie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not even close to passing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:56, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ștefan Pănoiu

The article Ștefan Pănoiu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not have independent, reliable sources addressing him directly and in depth, failing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amir Jorza

The article Amir Jorza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV on this footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amir Jorza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Jorza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Jorza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ștefan Pănoiu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ștefan Pănoiu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ștefan Pănoiu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rareș Ilie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rareș Ilie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rareș Ilie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cristian Măgerușan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cristian Măgerușan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristian Măgerușan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antonio Sefer

The article Antonio Sefer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salut

Te rog frumos sa nu mai faci pagini pentru jucatori care nu sunt eligibili pentru a avea pagina pe wikipedia. Conditiile sunt 1. Macar 1 aparitie in Liga 1 2. Meciuri internationale pt. Romania, daca nu indeplineste niciuna dintre conditii pagina va fi stearsa oricum si munca ta e in zadar. Multumesc User talk:Rhinen 07:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sebastian Serediuc for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sebastian Serediuc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Serediuc until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Constantin Albu. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 17:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dragos411: Daca era trecut gresit numele jucatorului trebuia sa muti pagina, nu sa faci inca un articol pe acelasi subiect. Si ti-am spus sa nu mai pui liniute cand scrii nationalele in infobox. De altfel, nu mai pune nationalele in infobox daca nu debuteaza si au macar o selectie. Multumesc.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 12:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nu e nicio problema, si eu am invatat pe parcurs. Prefer sa-ti dau un mesaj dupa ce vad ca ai gresit ceva decat sa te las sa continui dupa in acelasi mod si sa ne pierdem amandoi din timpul liber dupa. Poti sa ma contactezi cand ai nelamuriri, de obicei intru des pe aici.

Scuze, te-am incurcat cu alt user pe care il cheama Dragos si edita in acelasi mod liniutele. Suntem cam multi Dragosi pe aici, inclusiv si eu. :) Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players pentru a vedea pe ce format trebuie sa se bazeze paginile pt jucatori.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 00:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nu, eu la liniile de cod nu am preferinte de editare, oricum nu se vad in articol efectiv. Ma referam ca in Infobox scria "Romania U-19" cu liniuta. Punem liniuta doar cand scriem numele conplet in articol (under-19), la prescurtare in infobox punem doar U21, U19 etc. S-ar putea sa fie un edit mai vechi de la celalalt Dragos daca nu ai modificat tu. :) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 08:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Debutantii

Salut. Am vazut ca ai inceput sa faci update la selectiile jucatorilor români. Te descurci bine, si cu template-ul pentru goluri e bine. Dar te rog la debutanti sa schimbi si link-ul din referinta, fiindca ma directiona catre pagina lui Sorescu. Mersi!8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 09:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aa, e in regula atunci. Data viitoare ai putea sa nu pui link-ul deloc daca inca nu exista, intr-un fel e mai ok sa nu fie referențiat decat sa fie referentiat gresit. Dar e ok, tine-o tot asa :) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 10:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Date

Hey, when updating the stats please also update the date parameter. Kante4 (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember. Kante4 (talk) 05:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit uri

Salut, te rog sa nu mai pui pozitiile jucatorilor cu litere mari daca nu sunt la inceput de rand (Attacking midfielder, nu Attacking Midfielder de exemplu).8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 14:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salut din nou

Nu mai pune colspan la competitiile in care joaca fotbalistii la Club statistics, se face separat pentru fiecare sezon.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 09:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Updating date

Hi there, I noticed you updated the stats for several Farul Constanta players, but forgot to update the date. When you update the appearances, make sure to change the date (where it says |pcupdate ) which is a few lines to the date you're updating. For example, you added the games played for Nov 29, but left the date the stats are correct as for example 10 September/4 November/etc. Also for the stats table sections as well, you did not update the dates. Can you remember to update the date as well in future edits? I updated some of them now to today's date. Best, RedPatch (talk) 17:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jucatorul tanar al anului

Salut, cei ce au acordat acum premii sunt de la Gala Fotbalului Romanesc, nu de la GSP. Din cate stiu GSP nu acorda acest premiu. Da, as vrea sa fac o pagina care sa contina toate premiile de la toate editiile de la Gala Fotbalului, dar o sa fiu greu sa gasesc surse pt fiecare an.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 14:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Referitor la subiectul Farul Constanta - Viitorul Constanta

Te rog respecta-mi munca de a corecta informatiile privind jucatori de la Farul Constanta. Eu inteleg ca actualul Farul este fostul Viitorul, dar e o entitate total diferita. Iti dau un exemplu sunt jucatori care au jucat in perioada 2017-2018 cum e cazul lui Mladen la Viitorul, iar Farul Constanta la vremea aceea era in Liga 3, deci nu prea se imbina una cu alta. Chiar daca a fost o fuziune jucatori nu mai apartin de aceeasi entitate , dovada ar fi si discutia asupra titlurilor obtinute de catre Viitorul. Apropo faci o treaba foarte buna, am observat ca editezi la zi si corect spre deosebire de multi alti useri romani de pe Wiki care mai mult vandalizeaza paginile. Iti multumesc

Salut! Stiu ca pe Wikipedia a ramas ca Farul din Liga 1 este de fapt Farul care a promovat—de aici si separarea "entitatilor" in infobox. In realitate, site-ul LPF, presa si chiar pagina lor oficiala trateaza Farul lui Hagi ca fiind vechiul Viitorul prin statisticile pe care le prezinta. Am citit mai multe articole si in general se considera ca Viitorul a luat DOAR brand-ul, nu si istoria efectiva. Am mai citit de altfel ca in cazul unei fuziuni, echipa rezultata va ramane pe locul fostei echipe plasata intr o liga inferioara, ceea ce nu s a intamplat in cazul Viitorul-Farul. (mai pe romaneste, daca era o fuziune adevarata noul Far juca acum in Liga II, ceea ce inseamna ca in Liga I e doar Viitorul cu alt nume)

Problema este ca nu am avut timp sa ma ocup de articolele astea din vara pana acum. Si nici altii nu au facut-o, desi unii utilizatori ca tine si au dat seama de situatia adevarata. Nu vreau sa i acuz pe restul de nimic, Hagi a stiut sa faca asa o poveste frumoasa ca sa para ca de fapt are vechea echipa. In plus, as avea nevoie de aprobarea catorva administratori ca sa fac aceste schimbari. Sugerez ca intre timp sa lasi asa cum spun baietii ca sa nu mai iasa conflicte. Nu stiu cand putem rezolva situatia asta, dar cred ca ar trebui sa discutam cu Rhinen ca sa ne mobilizam in viitorul apropiat.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 21:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sut si Tarnovanu

Salut. Asa cum ai spus, doar fiindca au semnat contracte mai devreme nu inseamna ca au fost si imprumutati inapoi. E acelasi caz ca la Nita si Morutan, au "contract in advance", nu imprumut. Acum depinde si de sursele pe care le gasesti, unele exprimari ar putea fi ambigue.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 22:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.fanatik.ro/romania-u-20-amical-norvegia-u20-elvetia-u20-19931371 Salut, aici pe Fanatik sunt ok.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 16:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eu zic ca daca nu le gasesti sa nu insisti prea mult pe selectiile under. Mie mi au zis ca numerele trebuie sa fie verificate cu o sursa crdibila (exemplu, pe soccerway scrie ca el are 5 meciuri cand de fapt tu stii ca are 7). Degeaba stii tu ca a jucat in nu stiu ce amical, si ar fi aiurea si sa pui un link pt fiecare meci doar ca sa motivezi statisticile alea. Eu sincer n am idee unde sa mai cauti altundeva.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 21:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Birligea

Salut, voiam sa te intreb unde ai gasit statisticile pentru meciurile de cupa si de play-off ale lui Birligea de cand era la Teramo. Eu nu le gasesc nicaieri si am vazut ca Teramo a jucat doar 3 meciuri in cupa in 2019-20, deci as avea nevoie de sursa de unde ai luat datele.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 10:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deci am vazut ca se potrivesc cu cele de pe Transfermarkt. Sa stii ca nu prea e considerata sursa de incredere, dar lasam asa acum. Am mai pus un link de la worldfootball.net.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 10:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mda, nu stiu exact de ce Wikipedia e impotriva lor. De multe ori au statistici pe care nu le mai gasesti in alte parti. Sa stii asa pt viitor sa iei din alte surse.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 17:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Doukouré moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kevin Doukouré, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 15:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romania national under-20 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CSM Slatina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, OzzyWolvie. Thank you for your work on Cristian Ignat. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raul Florucz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raul Florucz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ionuț Cojocaru moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ionuț Cojocaru, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo Marins moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gustavo Marins, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raul Florucz

Hello, OzzyWolvie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raul Florucz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ASC Oțelul Galați, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariel López.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Pop

There is already a profile of Alexandru Pop on Wikidata and you created another one.(https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q64944957) Jonathan Archer (talk) 14:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, OzzyWolvie. Thank you for your work on Tony Strata. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Bădescu

Salut! Iti apreciez munca de pe Wikipedia, cred ca ti-am mai zis asta si inainte, dar as vrea sa ai grija cu anumite chestii:

Niciodata virgula dupa numele jucatorului, doar daca e intr-o lista sau la sfarsitul unei propozitii dintr-o fraza mai lunga. De altfel, folosim in general doar numele de familie ale jucatorilor in articol. Singura exceptie e la brazilieni, portughezi si uneori spanioli, care sunt cunoscuti dupa doua prenume (Cristiano Ronaldo dos Santos Aveiro -> Cristiano Ronaldo -> Ronaldo);
La Postions, doar primul cuvant e cu litera mare (Left-back, Centre-back -> Left-back, centre-back);
Mereu spatiu dupa o referinta, nu conteaza daca e punct sau virgula inainte. ([2]There -> [2] There);
Niciodata referinte inainte de punct sau virgula;
Sa n-ai referinte e rau, dar nici sa ai prea multe nu e bine.
Incearca sa traduci referintele, sa pui data publicarii, limba, data la care le-ai accesat etc.
Nu mai pune nota "Includes Cupa Romaniei", e de la sine inteles care e cupa nationala a Romaniei. In general doar la competitiile europe punem note.

8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 13:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Footballer biographies

Hello! Thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia's coverage of footballers! I've noticed that many of the articles you've made are incredibly short, some as short as one sentence. If I can offer a suggestion, you should create these articles in WP:DRAFT space so they can be properly developed before moving them to mainspace. This prevents New Page Patrol from becoming clogged with stubs and it helps with quality over quantity. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ricky Gnéba

The article Ricky Gnéba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NSPORT with no WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi OzzyWolvie. Thank you for your work on Andrei Rus. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I have marked it reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi OzzyWolvie. Thank you for your work on Răzvan Tănasă. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I have marked it reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]