User talk:Dr rajatsubhra
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Edits on Vedic meter
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. You made some edits at the article Vedic meter which did not appear to be improvements, and have been reverted. If you wish to make these changes again, please discuss them on the talk page Talk:Vedic meter first. Regards, Shreevatsa (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Mr shreevastava has written.......
'because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent'
MY CONTRIBUTION WAS........
in Sanskrit culture whenever any homa(yajna) ,pranayam, Sandhya Bandana is done ,seven planes(Sapto loka) are recalled,and they are chanted.This is called sapta-Byahriti. They are Bhu,Bhuba,Swa,Maho,Jano,tapo,&Satya. For Bhu Gayatri(24 letters) chanda, likewise, Bhuba-Ushnik(28 letters),Swa-Anustup(32 letters),Maho-Bhrihati(36 letters), Jano-Pankti(40letters),Tapo-Tristup(44 letters) &Satya-Jagati48 letters).These all have separate Deity/Lord. But the interesting thing is that these chronological order is very scientific. In every case 4 letters(akshar) gap in ascending manner .The chanted song must follow these rhythms &each pattern have different impacts on body, mind & over envirnment. THE ALWAYS FIRST SOUND 'OM' IS IN GAYATRI CHANDA. SO NOBODY CAN DO CHANTING WITH THEIR OWN STYLE . AND THAT WILL CAUSE NEGATIVE /NO IMPACT. AND THAT IS WHY THIS VEDIC VERSES WERE SO HIDDEN ONCE UPON A TIME. I GAVE THE REFERRENCES OF VISHNUPURAN. Which part is incoherent? SAPTA BYAHRITI is well known to all Vedic Brahmins.I just co-related among Byahriti-Chanda[metre]-pada-& lokas[planes/realms].I pointed out the science of utterings of these Byahrities.Is these not co related with vedic metres? dr rajatsubhra.
Speedy deletion nomination of Sapta loka
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Sapta loka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Errant [tmorton166] (chat!) 14:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)