User talk:Dr Mithilesh rana

Welcome!

Hi Dr Mithilesh rana! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Malcolmxl5. I noticed that you made a comment on the page talk:Ayurveda that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In two edits, you have called editors 'mad' and another 'a dictator'. Don’t do that. If there are changes supported by high quality sources that you would like to see to the article, do propose them. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC .I said it to editor first of all your all data is biased if your editor take validation from private organisations than please stop to edit a topics Dr Mithilesh rana (talk) 11:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia says any thing a quack or pseudoscience without knowing the fact is way to be polite?? Dr Mithilesh rana (talk) 11:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state, and those sources describe the topic at issue as the article describes. If those independent sources are being summarized inaccurately, please describe the nature of the errors on the article talk page. If the sources are being described accurately and you just disagree with them, you will have to take that up with the Indian Medical Association and others, not us. You are free to believe what you wish and free to disagree with what is written on Wikipedia, but you may not make personal attacks. 331dot (talk) 12:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all IMA never say ayurveda as quack . Dr Mithilesh rana (talk) 12:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have to make other page as bams doctor in which you can say that ayurveda doctor who practice modern science are quack Dr Mithilesh rana (talk) 12:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The IMA's own page disagrees with you, but I am not interested in debating it. You must refrain from making personal attacks; if you are unable to edit in that area without doing so, please find another topic to edit about. 331dot (talk) 12:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And third thing if you take data from private organisations than a baba said that allopathic is finished science then publish it on page Dr Mithilesh rana (talk) 12:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me a line where IMA says says ayurveda as quack? Dr Mithilesh rana (talk) 12:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just give me answers ? Dr Mithilesh rana (talk) 12:14, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The citation is given in the article; I have nothing else to say about this matter; if you wish to change it, please make a cogent, logical argument preferably based in Wikipedia policy on the article talk page. Further personal attacks will result in your being blocked. 331dot (talk) 12:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Than block me if oppose a wrong article wrong thing than you can block me Dr Mithilesh rana (talk) 12:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You would not be blocked for mere opposition to an article or its content. You would be blocked for disruptive behavior such as personal attacks or aggressive persistence or edit warring. 331dot (talk) 12:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]