User talk:Dr Lisboa

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Lisboa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the sole reason given for sock puppetry claims is reverting deletions of sections of the Jesus article. yet all those editors who repeatedly deleted the section have not been questioned or criticised. There is obvious religious bias from the Administrator that has blocked everybody that opposes the deletions. He has not blocked or even warned all of those people that repeatedly did the deleting of the section. Double standards are being applied based on religious bias

Decline reason:

Confirmed abusive sockpuppeteer, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr Lisboa. — Yamla 15:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Lisboa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla has completely failed to provide any evidence that opposes what I have written. Are the standards of these assessmenst so low that evidence and explanations are never provided ? Can an Admninistrator that actually knows how to do the job look at this.

Decline reason:

A CheckUser has confirmed that sock puppetry has taken place using this account per this case file and as such, this block is considered final and cannot be appealed any further. -- Netsnipe ► 16:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.