Jump to content

User talk:Dr Fetus PhD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adding your own commentary

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not leave nonsensical edit summaries, per WP:EDITSUMMARY. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok Dr Fetus PhD (talk) 20:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —Ingenuity (t • c) 17:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Fetus PhD (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How rude for blocking me! I did make positive contributions to Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel, Disney's Animal Kingdom Villas, and List of Tetris variants! Dr Fetus PhD (talk) 18:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you did not. Further frivolous unblock requests will result in a loss of access to your talk page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Fetus PhD (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dont you guys need to like assume good faith??? and like note "bite" newcomers?? Because this feels very unfair. I know I vandalised the chipmunks page and I'm sorry for that, but MY CONTRIBUTIONS to the Squeakquel, the Disney page, and Tetris variants were constructive because I added info! This is so cruel! Please give me another chance to be good and if i vandalise again you can block me for 303^^^303 years!! I WONT MAKE NONSENSICAL EDIT SUMMARIES EVER AGAIN!!!!!!Dr Fetus PhD (talk) 19:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Fetus PhD (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, here goes (hopefully) nothing again... but the third time is the charm...
I'm sorry for vandalising Wikipedia, I thought adding some silly comments was funny but it's not, and it's my fault that I confused the whole world because of my vandalism. Please, give me one more chance for me to be good, I will be a good editor from now on and I will not vandalise or mess around with Wikipedia ever again! You can trust me, because I made somewhat constructive edits to some pages (see: [1]; I reverted vandalism on Cars 2, added links to the Disney Villas (although it was reverted), and added slightly more detail in the plot of "Alvin and the Chipmunks: the Squeakquel" (the scene actually happened, I seen the movies). Also the old women fell down the stairs in the Squeakquel, not an escalator, and it's my fault for accidentally misremembering, I didn't mean it. If you unblock me I will change it to what actually happened in the Squeakquel. Also I'm sorry for making nonsensical edit summaries and original research, I will cite my resources and make good edit summaries from now on. Please, give me one more chance, I've changed. Also, why is carykh's Scrabble Tetris (which I accidentally called Scrabbletris) not allowed in Tetris variants? The YouTube video on it has over 70K views and carykh has over 600K subscribers and over 1.5K Newgrounds followers.
Please unblock me and give me another chance.
I won't vandalise Wikipedia from now on. Dr Fetus PhD (talk) 19:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We require third-party reliable sources with in-depth coverage about a topic for it to merit inclusion here. Number of views or follower count of a person or subject does not apply toward that criteria. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]