User talk:DrSuPa1

Welcome!

Hello, DrSuPa1. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do cite reliable sources   Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't add original research   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 15:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

August 2021

Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Atul Kochhar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 12:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your concern. I'm belong to the same city where Atul Kochhar was born & brought up. Infact I have studied in the same school where he completed his school education. That's the reason I added that information. DrSuPa1 (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Then you also know that Atul Kochbar is still alive. So, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. And that policy states clearly:

We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing. Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP, whether or not that person is the subject of the article, and to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages, including talk pages. The burden of evidence rests with the editor who adds or restores the material.

In short: personal info MUST be sourced or MUST be removed. The Banner talk 20:24, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

The information which I gave is 100% authentic, but I do not know whether I will get any online evidence regarding that. DrSuPa1 (talk) 08:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

I believe you on that point but that rule has bitten me quite a few times too. But the source does not necessarily be in English, nor on the internet. As long as it can be checked and is prior published. The Banner talk 08:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Can I write [citation needed] on the information I posted ? DrSuPa1 (talk) 08:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

No, you must give a source. The Banner talk 09:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

What you did (again) was not giving a source but you placed a remark. But when I was looking up the alumni, I went a dead link]. So sorry, but this is not what is needed. The Banner talk 16:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Regarding the Page Hima Kohli

Hii DrSuPa1,

        I have seen that you have edited the page list of sitting Supreme Court Judges. But, I are doing a mistake that in that the Parent High Court of Justice Hima Kohli is Delhi and you are doing it Telangana. You should first read about Justice Hima Kohli. Her Parent High Court is Delhi High Court. She was the Chief Justice of Telangana High Court. But, she initially joined delhi high court as its judge in year 2006. I think you are understood. 

Thanks SONIANKIT135 (talk) 07:16, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Correction:- But, you are doing a mistake SONIANKIT135 (talk) 07:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

The last court from where judges are elevated is known as the 'Parent Court'. Since she was the Hon'ble CJI of the Telangana High Court before joining the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, Telangana High Court shall be considered as her 'Parent High Court'. DrSuPa1 (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, I'm DEFCON5. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Indu Malhotra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 10:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi DrSuPa1! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Indu Malhotra that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SUN EYE 1 15:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jamshedpur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced information - including in inappropriate infobox fields noq (talk) 09:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Can you please tell me which one ? I am a citizen of Jamshedpur. DrSuPa1 (talk) 13:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jamshedpur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions concerning India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed. Please read WP:TBAN to see what "topic banned" means.

You have been sanctioned for adding contentious unsourced content and original research after warning.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Doug Weller talk 16:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: I have not looked at the AIV report about violating the Topic Ban. So I thought I'd ping you.

@DrSuPa1: Is it true that you are editing in violation of your topic ban? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

I see three such edits. WOuldn't you like to revert at least the last one? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

@Doug Weller is this ban still in place, because @DrSuPa1is still engaging in disruptive edits on subjects concerning India. - Naushervan (talk) 03:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

@DrSuPa1 Please let me know if they do this again. Doug Weller talk 08:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Which one ? Kindly elaborate DrSuPa1 (talk) 06:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

If you didn't understand the topic ban, you should have asked. Blocked.

DrSuPa1, you seem to have gone on cheerfully editing all sorts of Indian subjects after you were topic banned from them, so asking "Which one?" as you do above isn't really relevant. Practically all your edits since the ban have involved Indian subjects. If you didn't understand what a topic ban is, you should have read WP:TBAN as recommended in the ban notice. And if that didn't help, you should have contacted Doug Weller to ask, as also recommended in the ban notice. I don't understand why you did not. I have given you just a short block of 72 hours for violating your topic ban. If you violate it again when you return, you will get a longer block, so please be careful. You can request unblock by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. However, any reviewing admin please note, this is a discretionary sanctions block. Bishonen | tålk 11:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC).

Your edits on B.V. Nagarathna

You deleted a sentence that mentioned her father, former Chief Justice of India, describing it as "removing a biased section." Please first of all discuss such changes on the talk page before you remove them. You are not the sole person who gets to decide what is biased and what is not. Secondly, you can't remove facts because you don't like them. See Wikipedia:I just don't like it for more. - Naushervan (talk) 05:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Actually there are growing problems in India regarding the appointments of judges and the judges are being subjected to scrutiny and criticism because most of the judges are children of former judges. This unrest may lead to permanent damage to the Independence of Judiciary and democracy in India. Information regarding the parents lead to biases. DrSuPa1 (talk) 06:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

You have not responded to a single point that I made. - Naushervan (talk) 03:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Dont add honorific prefix in infobox. It doesn't change in any way before or after its addition.

Hello, I'm Eagle Site. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Eagle Site (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks DrSuPa1 (talk) 06:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

So far as I can see, every article you edit is covered by the topic ban, expect to be blocked indefinitely next time.

If you edit again on any Indian related article I shall block you indefinitely. Doug Weller talk 08:17, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

@Doug Weller The user continues to not only edit India related articles, but almost all of his recent edits are disruptive in nature. Just a reminder to look into this. Thank you. SoloKnowHow83 (talk) 14:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

@SoloKnowHow83 thanks, as you can see, someone beat me to it. Doug Weller talk 15:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

I have not edited any India, Afghanistan or Pakistan related articles recently. I have only edited articles related to certain institutions. I have added necessary citations as well and I believe that blocking me from editing Wikipedia is an act of disrespecting and disregarding my selfless service and the time I spent making Wikipedia better and informative. DrSuPa1 (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued violation of your topic-ban from "all pages and discussions concerning India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, broadly construed", despite previous warnings and blocks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)