User talk:DrRichardDavis

Speedy deletion nomination of User:DrRichardDavis

A tag has been placed on User:DrRichardDavis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 06:58, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for a short period

Seriously, posting like that everywhere you can think of is extremely annoying. The more you spam it, the less likely it becomes that anyone will listen to you, and the more likely that the next administrator to come across your edits will respond with an infinite block. If you have a problem with a page's deletion, talk to the administrator who deleted it. If you cannot reach a resolution, post to the Administrators' noticeboard. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 07:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your article

First, please do not post the same message everywhere.
Second, Wikipedia is not the place for "helping" a noble cause.
Third, according to the results of Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL, this organization is unlikely to be notable. As such, even if you created a neutrally-written article, it will still likely be deleted. Given our commitment to neutrality, it is impossible to write an acceptable article without some significant coverage in sources independent of the subject. Tim Song (talk) 07:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be quite clear, if you continue to post the contents of this article anywhere, you will be blocked from editing, and next time will be indefinitely. The answer is "no", not "if you ask enough times it'll be alright". Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop.

I don't need spam clogging up my talk page. fetchcomms☛ 15:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Before you continue to spam others' talk pages please consider the following:

You will be blocked indefinitely if it continues. fetchcomms☛ 15:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your post to my talk page

Regardless of whether or not your son/father/whoever was killed in a war, that fact, alone, does not inherently bestow any sort of notability upon your biography/group. Furthermore, it is apparent that you might not be as fully aware of our policies and guidelines as you might believe. For instance, judging by your contributions list, it would appear that not only have you ignored the canvassing guideline by cross-posting the same message to several talk and user pages, you also seem to be confusing user pages with talk pages. Finally, your deleted article, The Police Bodyguard Group, appeared to not only lack in notability for groups, but also had a strong advertising tone to it.

Combined, I agree with the deleting admin's actions, and furthermore encourage you to review our guidelines for creating new pages as well as our conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Cheers. --slakr^\ talk / 19:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]