User talk:DrRevXyzzy

IHH (İnsani Yardım Vakfı)‎

Re [1], the issue is being discussed at Talk:IHH_(İnsani_Yardım_Vakfı)#Uncritical_editorship you can join in there. And could please be more polite in edit summaries? Thanx Misarxist (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:3 (number) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jusdafax 19:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think my talk page edit was very constructive - it actually brought attention to the fact that the article was a piece of shit. I AM FIXING YOUR BROKEN WIKI BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY, AND DON'T TRY TO STOP ME.X \' Z Z \' (talk) 22:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to 3 (number), even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Much of the article is inappropriate, but if you ever again remove something against consensus (such as, for example position numbers, number of points for a score, or retired jersey numbers), you will be blocked. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Hi I've deleted your userpage and am blocking your account. We are here to write an encyclopaedia, and that requires the sort of civil atmosphere that you reject. You are more than welcome to continue reading Wikipedia, and if at some point you change your mind and want to contribute in a non-threatening civil way, then post an unblock request and I'm sure the first admin to come by will unblock you. PS I've also raised this at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#DrRevXyzzy Ϣere SpielChequers 09:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst some of your edits were indeed useful and I thank you for them, your invective and incivility in edit summaries, talkpages and elsewhere is not acceptable on this site. I've revoked your talkpage access, if in the future you want to come back and contribute in a more collegial manner you are welcome to Email Arbcom. Ϣere SpielChequers 10:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Técoult for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Técoult is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Técoult until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KingAndGod 17:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]