User talk:DrNickRiviera1
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, DrNickRiviera1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bishop Luffa School did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. SovalValtos (talk) 17:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Black Kite (talk) 22:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)- This seems entirely ridiculous. SolvalValtos is attempting to bully other users by removing correct edits and then claiming to be doing the right thing. I have been a director at this school for 25 years, so am quite aware that I know what I'm talking about. It is essential that Wikipedia stays a source for reliable information, and a safe community. SolvalValtos has undermined this at my expense, and the expense of the public. DrNickRiviera1 (talk) 10:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
DrNickRiviera1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked for no reason. All of my edits have been clearly citied DrNickRiviera1 (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This edit has no citation. Nor does this. This edit has citations, but not for the information you added. Additionally, the citations there are poor quality. I stopped looking at this point. Yamla (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Administrating the project to ensure edits adhere to our policies and guidelines is not bullying, and personal attacks are not permitted here. Any further instances of such will lead to your talk page access being revoked.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
- I very much doubt a director of a school would behave in this manner. Regardless, talk page access revoked.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)